Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodworm Demo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:06, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Woodworm Demo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced stub article on a demo album. Alternatively: merge/redirect to Radiohead or Radiohead demos. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:45, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this
talk) 01:00, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow ^Talk 04:07, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If it's got to go, I say merge to new article Radiohead demos. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not enough for a stand-alone article. I recommend adding text about this and other demos to the appropriate "History" section at the Radiohead article. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:40, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.