Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Workers Development Union (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ✗plicit 06:46, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Workers Development Union

Workers Development Union (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:58, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:58, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:21, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Besides the concerns outlined by the OP, the article is written rather like an advertisement: "SAS works among the masses to transform unjust structures of society and to build harmonious communities of diverse peoples, religions, languages and cultures helping them to satisfy their basic human needs." Perhaps not surprising, as most of it is sourced to this 12-page paper, pp. 17—28, which is also written like an advertisement and is part of a collection with the subtitle "Marketing to promote local breeds and improve livelihoods". Note in the preliminary matter of this collection that the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, as well as several other prestigious organizations involved, distance themselves from any responsibility for the opinions in the individual papers, and from any mention of specific companies or products. "The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of FAO, LPP or IUCN" (p. 4). So the mention in the footnote of the Food and Agriculture Organization as publisher, while true and surely offered in good faith, could be a little misleading. Bishonen | tålk 09:26, 27 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]
• Keep The subject is a non government organization also called Shramik Abhivrudhi Sangh and Jana Jagran is notable for sheep/wool rearing though it works in other areas we well, particurly for its success in working with the
  WP:NEXIST. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:53, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • So you guess that there are sources? The Banner talk 16:33, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article already has references from the The Hindu ,Indiana University and the Food and Agriculture Organization.Only said finding local language sources is difficult.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:04, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep there are sources, and likely more in local languages and print-only newspapers. LashandaWilhelm (talk) 20:20, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.