Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Heavyweight Championship (Total Extrme Nonstop Wrestling )

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. JohnCD (talk) 20:26, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

World Heavyweight Championship (Total Extrme Nonstop Wrestling )

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe this to be a hoax, as there is literally no coverage of "Total Extreme Nonstop Wrestling" outside Wikipedia or Wikipedia mirrors on the internet, which is extremely surprising for any sort of recent wrestling promotion. I am also nominating:

WEW Do or Die
WEW Redemption
List of TENW pay-per-view events
WEW Sin
Women's XX Championship (Total Extrme Nonstop Wrestling) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthem of joy (talk • contribs) 21:56, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anthem of joy (talk) 06:13, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all of them. They do not seem to have anything written about them, and the OP is correct; that is amazingly odd for a wrestling event. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:24, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - walled garden of hoaxes -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:13, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:11, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all, even if it is real, it doesn't meet
WP:GNG. Nikki♥311 19:13, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete all of them, as a hoax. — Moe ε 23:10, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as probable hoax. Carrite (talk) 05:40, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all as a hoax and soon Porturology (talk) 01:57, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. Unverifiable. Either hoaxes or utterly non-notable, probably the former. Where there are references provided they conspicuously fail to verify the content. --DanielRigal (talk) 22:03, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.