Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WrestleBunny

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:34, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WrestleBunny

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

"WrestleBunny" seems to be a new/minor character in some kind of wrestling league. I very much doubt that this is sufficiently notable to warrant its own article. It probably could be merged with something, however I do not know which other article may be appropriate. Travelbird (talk) 07:35, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the red links. It's too early to put this up, so I'm going to say delete per nom. ~~Bigtop~~ みんな空の下 (トーク) 08:59, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as article fails
notability criteria for entertainers. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 10:38, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails
WP:ENTERTAINER. Nikki♥311 19:14, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Not a minor character in a wrestling league. She's a youtube personality with a lot of fans. Just because no one knows her last name doesn't mean she's not notable. She's the next big deal. She's got a po box that receives fanmail, her own website, and she does shows. There are countless articles, interviews, and fan junk about her all over the web. She's been noticed by many top wrestling organizations. To consider her a minor character means you don't know your female wrestling personalities. 71.202.35.123 (talk) 07:37, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If there are
reliable sources, we would appreciate, that you add them. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 10:58, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.