Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XD Theater
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Triotech Amusement. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 13:03, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
XD Theater
No indication of WP:notability. No independent WP:reliable sources. Disputed prod. noq (talk) 19:46, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with this article. Whenaxis (talk) 23:22, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: The article being discussed has been tagged for ]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 00:18, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 00:18, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: Modified my opinion. See below.
Smerge and redirect toTriotech Amusement may take advantage of the techonolgy (their article may be at AFD soon), we can send readers to that of the creator of the technology. IF the article's advert tone is addresed and it umakes use available sources, I'll reconsider. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 02:27, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] - Merge to Triotech Amusement, the company that appears to have created the technology. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:13, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: Modified my opinion. See below.
TheTriotech Amusement article has little content and seems itself ready for AFD. While they used this technology to create "their motion simulators such as XD Theater and Jett Rider", it appears that Century Theatres actually created the tecnology. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:05, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] - Note: Modified my opinion. See below.
To clarify... my thought here is that while a redirect to Triotech Amusement as creator of the amusement ride is reasonable, THAT article itself appears to failWP:CORP and if or when deleted we'd have left a redirect hanging which would itself likely be deleted through cleanup. IF the Triotech Amusement article were stronger and better sourced, I would tend to agree. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 19:41, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] - Perhaps we can take the time to TRY to improve the article. If that's not possible, then we would need to redirect Triotech and XD Theater to Century Theatres. Whenaxis (talk) 21:58, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: Modified my opinion. See below.
Note to adminstrator: Please leave this ]
- Merge to Triotech Amusement as the proposed target article is being improved and sourced.[1] I am now okay with a smerge to Triotech. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 04:16, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - From the Triotech Amusement website, brochure for the XD Theater attraction, which the article is about: "Triotech – Redefining immersive experiences. Again, it appears that merging to Triotech Amusement would be the best fit, as it appears that Triotech invented the technology. While there is a section in the article about XD theaters, it's not the article's primary focus. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:18, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.