Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yash Thakur (Fitness Coach)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow delete. Geschichte (talk) 11:32, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yash Thakur (Fitness Coach)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rejected draft in AFC moved directly to mainspace. Copying my comment from my talk page which should serve as rationale of this AFD:

Most of them are very obviously paid and others are written in away that it indicated they are influenced. For example, Mid-day says brandmedia, Business Standard says BS Marketing initiative, Telegraph says ABP Digital Brand Studio, DNA says 'It is a featured article' at the end, The Week says focus. The Hindi ones, I might be okay with News 18 (it still doesn't have a staff byline!). Jagran is his opinion on stuff so that's out. Patrika can't be considered WP:RS considering that they publish basically anything. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 19:47, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 19:47, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 19:47, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as
WP:G11. The author had a chance when I moved it into draft space the first time. The fact that there was absolutely zero effort to improve it suggests that the article was created in bad faith, purely to promote (and the author admits to a COI), using poor sources. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:09, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - all the paid-for spam content in the world still isn't enough to pass
WP:GNG Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:13, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bodybuilding-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:14, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete blatantly spam content for references. --Whiteguru (talk) 22:44, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above.4meter4 (talk) 02:04, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 10:33, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above fails
WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:23, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - Spam article. Spam references. Miserable failure of
GNG. --Jack Frost (talk) 13:04, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.