Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yesoteric

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JForget 22:37, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yesoteric

Yesoteric (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bootlegs are assumed non-notable per

• Keep Bootlegs are not assumed non-notable, they are generally non-notable. The ELs in this article, and the many hits found in a google search, show that Yesoteric has been the subject of sufficient attention to be notable. TJRC (talk) 23:16, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep - in this case the assumption about bootlegs does not quite hold up because the album is much-discussed and had an impact on subsequent events in the band's discography. I have tried to find some better sources but what's in the article now might be all that's available. If anyone happens to find a couple more solid sources, that should settle the notability question. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:12, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Yes, this is a bootleg, but every now and then you find one that has become notorious. This is one of them, and the Google searches show up more than enough, in the aspect of third party sources, to warrant keeping this article. Undead Warrior (talk) 02:25, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Like Undead Warrior said, this set is notorious. I'm sure the article could be expanded to address any concerns, but I'd certainly say it's notable. I'm not sure whether a source can be found, but I would personally guarantee that its existence and widespread nature played a huge part in the decision to release such expansive bonus material on Rhino's Yes re-releases as well as the "The Word Is Live" box set. —Shada Ng (talk | contribs) 16:50, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.