Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yukon Yahoo

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:34, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yukon Yahoo

Yukon Yahoo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub article that lacks notability and sufficient references. Astros4477 (talk) 05:01, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: Article meets credibility, written by industry professional, will find more sources later. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julser1 (talk • contribs) 11:08, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:15, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not notable. "I wrote it" is not a valid reason to keep. -
    Talkback) 20:58, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Note: There is a citation from the Chicago Tribune that gives a credible citation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julser1 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's still not notable though. -
Talkback) 13:27, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Comment - I did search. I did not find substantial coverage. If you did -- and if that is the reason for your "keep" !vote, please give us links to the substantial coverage you found. I have nothing. My !vote stands. -
    talk) 04:42, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Duplicate vote per
talk) 07:39, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Comment - As I said to the previous IP, if you found substantial coverage in independent reliable sources, please give us links to the substantial coverage you found. I have nothing. My !vote stands. -
    talk) 03:43, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Duplicate vote per
talk) 07:39, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Merge to Anton Schwarzkopf if reliable sources exist documenting that he designed this particular roller coaster. There is a already a list there quite suited for the purpose. The reference given does not imply notability, nor are the references I found searching, nor have any other such references been given. הסרפד (call me “Hasirpad”) (formerly R——bo) 04:51, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – Per Wikipedia's
    general notability guideline, the subject does not appear to meet several criteria to exist as a standalone article. However, it is worth mentioning that the guideline also states, "Verifiable facts and content not supported by multiple independent sources may be appropriate for inclusion within another article". So at least in that respect, it may still be notable enough to be included in the Anton Schwarzkopf article, assuming at least one reference can be cited. But as a standalone article? Not so much. --GoneIn60 (talk) 17:52, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — 
[talk] 05:42, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
Stating an article is notable does not demonstrate it is notable. -
talk) 01:08, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
Duplicate vote per
talk) 07:39, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Yukon_Yahoo&oldid=1138710624"