Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaheer Abbass Gondal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:38, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zaheer Abbass Gondal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unsourced Biography of a Living Person (contrary to the

General Notability Guideline. A person's notability is not inherited from the things he has worked on, or the people he has worked with. Exemplo347 (talk) 10:06, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete - appears to be a

WP:Coatrack to promote the ideas, and the books, (one of several started by the same author), rather than a biography of a notable person - Arjayay (talk) 10:25, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:55, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:55, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:55, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Also note that article was previously tagged with a 'prod blp' tag because it is totally unreferenced. The tag was removed by the article creator clearly editing logged out to avoid scrutiny. The article is still totally unreferenced and can be deleted on this point alone. I also deleted two external links added by the logged out user that linked to sites advertising the very books listed in the article. 86.145.209.181 (talk) 13:59, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteUnsourced, non notable promotion of a translater L3X1 (distant write) 01:46, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the points laid out by the nominator (GNG, BLP violation). I normally add more details but in this case, the nominator already hit on the main points. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:16, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Nothing offered to establish notability or even indicating any little significance whasoever. — kashmiri ^TALK 06:55, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per the concerns raised in
WP:DUCK. Narky Blert (talk) 23:10, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - doesn't meet
WP:GNG. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 01:56, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.