Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zatopeks
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete, based on consensus that the subject and album fail to qualify
]Zatopeks
- Zatopeks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Ain't Nobody Left But Us (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Completing unfinished nom for
talk · contribs), apparently Twinkle choked. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 04:45, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
- Unbiased Delete to the artist and album, neither of which appear to be notable per WP:MUSIC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 05:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep per [1] Sputnikmusic is somewhat reliable, as is, minorly, [2] jersey beat. Wisdom89 (T / C) 05:39, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 (T / C) 05:42, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete - Last.fm has very few plays, and doesn't seem to be notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asenine (talk • contribs)
""Keep"". They are a notable UK band, relevant to US labels that have worked with them. Also, sources such as Last FM or similar are not always reliable in the punk genre. - JoeThird —Preceding unsigned comment added by JoeThird (talk • contribs) 14:31, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Finally, the nom shows up. Sorry all, had problems with my talk) 05:53, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- delete - no proof of any notability whatsoever. They opened for Tuuli? So did my co-worker's daughter! In fact, I have a friend who necked with ]
- Delete As per nom.Clearly fails ]
- Weak Keep - Fails talk) 03:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - If you sincerely feel that the article fails notability criteria, then shouldn't your !vote be delete? Wisdom89 (T / C) 04:29, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.