Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zina Saunders

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tawker (talk) 06:42, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zina Saunders

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged (by me) for notability questions since July 2013. The subject is clearly an active writer for a number of major periodicals and most of this article is about this work, cited to the periodical articles themselves. I've searched for significant independent coverage about Saunders but can find very little - a short article and very long quote in a Queens NY magazine, and a listing article in a Connecticut publication. Not sure this is sufficient to convince me she passes

WP:GNG criteria. Sionk (talk) 20:10, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:09, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:09, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:09, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The subject matter seems notable enough. Perfect Orange Sphere (talk) 06:20, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I had looked at her article at the launch of WikiProject Women Artists and decided it was a keeper, just needing some improvement source wise. I consider her work with major publishers to be the equivalent of a major exhibition at a museum. She's also designed numerous cards for
SarahStierch (talk) 16:36, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep the references noted by SarahStierch evidence notability under
WP:GNG. --j⚛e decker ^talk 02:14, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.