Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoe Abbott

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:46, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zoe Abbott

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zoe Abbott

This article about this financial consultant appears to have been written to praise her rather than to describe her neutrally. The text of the article does not establish how she is

run-of-the-mill

investment consultant. A check of the references answers any question about whether this article should be kept. All of the references are either interviews of varying degrees of promotion, or puff pieces. There is no secondary coverage.

Number	Reference	Remarks	Independent	Significant	Secondary
1	Influencerhustle.com	An interview that appears to be promotional	No	Yes	No
2	Voyagetampa.com	Another promotional interview	No	Yes	No
3	Fox13news.com	A more neutral interview	Not really	Yes	No
4	tricitydaily.com	An article that reads like an advertisement	No	Yes	No
5	globalnewswire.com	Another interview	No	Yes	No
6	Forbesindia.com	A story about the subject that reads like a puff piece	Yes	Yes	No
7	Finance.yahoo.com	An interview that reads like an advertisement	No	Yes	No

If she is notable, then this article should go into a

biography of a living person. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:40, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Business, and Iowa. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:40, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per
WP:GNG is also not supported. Beccaynr (talk) 06:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per nom and per
talk) 07:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete: as per
WP:PROMO Tatupiplu'^talk 07:26, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete: Press releases do not count towards establishing notability.-- Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 08:19, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom and
WP:PROMO.Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 11:31, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Paid posts, mostly promotional stuff found, Delete. Oaktree b (talk) 13:49, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Article was speedy deleted three days ago, recreated by the same, very new, account. Still no trace of notability. // Maddy ♥︎(they/she)♥︎ :: talk 17:57, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per above mentioned comments. Fade258 (talk) 13:32, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete
WP:PROMO -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:18, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.