Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zohreh
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Communications in Iran. Sandstein 17:04, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Zohreh
- Zohreh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Name applied to a succession of proposed Iranian comm satellites, otherwise unrelated. Prod removed as art does have refs. But to link different uses of the same name results in confusion: nobody in 1995 planned to launch a commsat in 2007. As
WP:CRYSTAL the article doesn't belong, but rather there should be more in Communications in Iran to clarify what commsats Iran does use and perhaps how and when those deals were reached. Potatoswatter (talk) 09:53, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 12:43, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 12:44, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Communications in Iran. Alone this article doesn't merit its own entry. Sonuvafitch (talk) 15:45, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per above. The article has many crystal ball problems as we don't know how it would eventually develop. Artene50 (talk) 09:42, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge the part about the communications satellite, as above, but the intro section should be left in that article as some kind of disambiguation page, trying to lift the confusion Potatoswatter mentioned. If there's been repeated plans with significant coverage about launching an Iranian satellite called Zohreh, there should be a page about it, and it shouldn't just redirect to Communications in Iran. --Amalthea (talk) 11:01, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.