Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zurich Bog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Zurich Bog

Zurich Bog (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails

• Note: This discussion has been included in the
  talk) 15:43, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Additional Details: This article was previously created as Zurich, New York, as far as I know. No article currently exists for Zurich, so possible redirect to there? And Zurich NY is an existing city, and has a post office in Arcadia, which is nearby.

talk) 15:50, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Comment: Looks like WP wont allow me to edit the comment with this one, so I have to leave it as is.

talk) 15:53, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

@Snowc776: - What are you seeing that gives that impression? All the way back to this original content in 2008 this article has been about the bog, it's never had a name change, and Zurich, New York doesn't appear to have ever existed. Hog Farm _Talk 14:59, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry about that @

talk) 15:02, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and New York. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:05, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As a federally designated National Natural Landmark, I would think notability is likely. Sources that provide coverage to corroborate this include [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. An alternative could be creation of the Bergen Swamp Preservation Society and merge there along with the organization's other conservation properties which include Bergen-Byron Swamp, another one of the 28 National Natural Landmarks in New York, all of which have articles or are appropriately covered in another article. Reywas92^Talk 17:47, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment So, this means natural landmarks doesn't need

talk) 17:49, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

• I'm sorry???? No, where did I say that?????? I see you've only been here for a week but AFD regulars may know I'm one of the more vehement editors saying that everything must pass GNG and there is no automatic notability. I said notability is likely for NNLs, not that they don't need to meet GNG. But then I provided 9 links that provide coverage indicating this location does pass GNG and verifiability. If you disagree that these are substantive enough I presented an
  WP:ATD because I think NNLs should still have coverage even if not warranting a stand-alone article. I can create clippings for the newspapers.com results if you can't access them. Reywas92^Talk 02:56, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Keep per the sources found by Reywas, which indicate enough to meet
  WP:GNG here. Hog Farm _Talk 14:57, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  Keep Agree with @

  talk) 14:59, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply

  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.