Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates/Requests/February 2007/Mishlai
Case Filed On: 16:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedian filing request:
Other Wikipedians this pertains to:
- Hypnosadist (talk · contribs)
Wikipedia pages this pertains to:
- Talk:IPCC_Fourth_Assessment_Report#NPOV (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)
- IPCC_Fourth_Assessment_Report (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Questions:
Have you read the
- Answer: Yes.
How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)
- Answer: Content dispute
What methods of
- Answer: None.
What do you expect to get from
- Answer: I am new to Wikipedia and seeking guidance on which dispute resolution methods would be the most appropriate 1st step.
Summary:
In essence I don't think that a particular block of text belongs in this particular article, and I advocate moving it. I think the talk page will be clear enough on the nature of the dispute. It seemed from WP:DR that 3rd party might be an appropriate next step, but the dispute is only *mostly* between 2 people, and I don't know how this works. It isn't representation that I seek, but an explanation/clarification of policy.
Update: Neigel von Teighen, thanks for opening the case. As you'll see I'm sure, the status has changed a little. It's pretty clearly not between 2 editors now, and as far as I can tell Hypnosadist is the only one advocating his viewpoint on the matter. The content issue itself may in fact be resolved now, I'm not sure. Any thoughts/clarifications you have on WP:DR are still appreciated. Thanks. Mishlai 14:52, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Discussion:
Followup:
When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:
Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
- Answer:
Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
- Answer:
On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?
- Answer:
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
- Answer:
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
- Answer:
If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
- Answer:
If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
- Answer:
AMA Information
Case Status: closed
Advocate Status:
- --Neigel von Teighen 14:47, 27 February 2007 (UTC)