Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 34
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was
Approved.
Operator: DannyS712 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 04:38, Sunday, April 28, 2019 (
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic
Programming language(s): AWB
Source code available: AWB
Function overview: Replace file links to Logo guidelines with links to Wikipedia:Logos#Copyright concerns
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 29 (similar task)
Edit period(s): One time run
Estimated number of pages affected: <137
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes
Function details: Fix links from the file namespace that improperly attempt to link to the guidelines about logos. Wikipedia:Logos is a content guideline, and the section specifically about copyright concerns is most applicable.
Discussion
Approved for trial (25 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. @DannyS712:. As usual, please report back here when done and take all the time that you need to complete this trial. --TheSandDoctor Talk 16:39, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- @TheSandDoctor:
Trial complete. 26 edits made, sorry - [1]. I didn't see any issues --DannyS712 (talk) 04:55, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- @DannyS712: I am curious, is it a code issue that has been making your trials 1 over lately? --TheSandDoctor Talk 06:14, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- @TheSandDoctor: um, maybe. Sorry --DannyS712 (talk) 06:26, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- @DannyS712: I am curious, is it a code issue that has been making your trials 1 over lately? --TheSandDoctor Talk 06:14, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Approved. For what it's worth (something to keep in mind in the future) - if you're editing less than ~150 pages, just do it manually on your main account (or a dedicated AWB-only account if you so feel) and save the hassle of a BRFA. Primefac (talk) 15:29, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.