Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 July 8

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:10, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Now empty. I am in the process of merging the few articles that would have fit this category into the Sue Grafton artilce, as all are stubs. I have already merged the one article formerly in the category. DES 8 July 2005 16:31 (UTC)

• Concur <>Who?¿? 8 July 2005 17:08 (UTC)
• Delete. Pavel Vozenilek 20:15, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:09, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Only member article is up for deletion for being an unencyclopedic attempt at discussion. --BaronLarf July 8, 2005 15:20 (UTC)

• Handle this through the
  VFD of structured discussion and structured discussion on abortion. If they are delted, this should be too. Dunc|☺
  8 July 2005 15:52 (UTC)
• Delete, Wikipedia is not a forum. Talk pages are for discussion, structure is a plus. Radiant_>|< July 8, 2005 18:50 (UTC)

• Delete w/o consideration of structured discussion, as per Radiant. There would be no other articles ever to place in this category, hence no need for the category. <>Who?¿? 22:16, 9 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge --Kbdank71 13:07, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rename to Merge to (see comments)

• Comment: these shows are entirely foreign to me. But a couple of random choices from the cat seemed to show that these are just Cartoon Network cartoons and should be merged to the relevant cat. I could be wrong; I would have no idea if there is a broadcaster in the U.S. (somebody take that to Abbreviations for Deletion) called "Cartoon Cartoons".-Splash 8 July 2005 12:35 (UTC)

Honestly, I never heard of it either, I had to go look on CN's website, to be sure there was a time segment called that. As Adult Swim is a segment, there is Toon?? (I already forgot the name) and I beleive one or two others. If it werent for the Adult Swim cat, I would have just said group them all into Category:Cartoon Network and delete all the subs. <>Who?¿? 8 July 2005 13:07 (UTC)

• Comment the proposed renaming category, Category:Shows on Cartoon Cartoons, was created by 24.30.157.246 on 20:54, 9 July 2005. Not really sure what to do about this now, other than adding it to this Cfr. <>Who?¿? 01:06, 10 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Addition
    Iff this category is not renamed then Category:Shows on Cartoon Cartoons should be deleted, as stated above, improperly created. <>Who?¿? 01:59, 10 July 2005 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Merge Category:Cartoon Cartoons with Category:Shows on Cartoon Cartoons. Seeing as this is, so far, the only vote apart from your nom, we can still change the consensus to this, epsecially if you strike your original nom and support your above suggestion. -Splash 02:08, 10 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:02, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicates Category:Amusement parks. Another category from MascotGuy/Cartoon Vandal. tregoweth July 8, 2005 04:51 (UTC)

• Merge to Category:Amusement parks if that is appropriate for the one article in the cat. Otherwise, just support nomination. -Splash 8 July 2005 12:31 (UTC)
• Merge as per -Splash. And then find me a non-family amusement park? ;-) <>Who?¿? 8 July 2005 13:10 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.