Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 October 29

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log
< October 28 October 30 >

October 29

Category:Renaissance architecture in Romania

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. – Fayenatic London 23:36, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only two subcategories, and neither of the two subcategories is about the Renaissance in a narrower sense anyway. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:11, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Isn't it odd to keep it while it only contains subcategories of around the year 1800 and around 1900? Marcocapelle (talk) 07:57, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lists of people by nickname

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. bibliomaniac15 04:56, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: merge per

WP:OVERLAPCAT, the articles are mostly about a nickname and contain a list, therefore they are in or belong in both categories. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:38, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Nicknames in basketball

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. bibliomaniac15 04:56, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:34, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose - The rationale doesn't exist.--寒吉 (talk) 16:45, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is no longer only one subcategory after having added two lists. Yet it remains a case of
    WP:SMALLCAT. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:56, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Oppose. Definitely useful for our users to preserve the category. --Just N. (talk) 15:17, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment why is this not also being proposed to be merged into the nickname heirarchy? -- 64.229.90.53 (talk) 16:27, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • All content of the category is already somewhere else in the nicknames hierarchy. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:52, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:City of Manningham

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:11, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: This category contained one article: City of Manningham, which was already correctly categorised under Category:Local government areas in Melbourne. I removed the redundant category from the article and the category now serves no purpose. ClaudineChionh (talk – contribs) 12:55, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

fair enough, not a problem about the removal. JarrahTree 12:57, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Small category that is not likely to get larger. FOARP (talk) 13:05, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Category has been emptied. Liz Read! Talk! 20:21, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. --Just N. (talk) 15:19, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:English anti-fascists

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 February 4#Category:English anti-fascists

Category:Reptiles of Niger

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. – Fayenatic London 11:03, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: per rationale of

Oculi (talk) 00:23, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2021_October_29&oldid=1069958212"