Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 October 3

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log
< October 2 October 4 >

October 3

Category:Deaths in Yorkshire and the Humber

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 10:36, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per this discussion. Thepharoah17 (talk) 23:27, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural comment, I have taken the liberty to merge these discussions. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:45, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all, if people die in the place they are from they should be in a "People from" category and otherwise the place of death is generally not defining (e.g. in a hospital or while having a heart attack). Marcocapelle (talk) 05:45, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per the previous consensus. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 07:27, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nominator. Place of death is not defining....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all because it's relevant to biographies. Place of death is usually stated in the ibox as well as the body of the article. Where their lives ended is of significant relevance to their lives & articles. To use high-profile cases, it's certainly relevant than JFK died in Dallas & Princess Diana in Paris. Try writing even a short account of the lives of either of them without mentioning where they died & it would be considered to have a major omission. To say that Paolo Borsellino shouldn't be in the Deaths in Palermo cat because said cat shouldn't exist makes no sense to me - in what way is it a trivial point? Jim Michael (talk) 14:32, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Paolo Borsellino is already in Category:Jurists from Palermo so having him in a Deaths in Palermo cat adds nothing. Even if he would have died elsewhere he would still be in the relevant Palermo category. Note that the nomination does not intend to remove the information altogether; having it in the ibox or in the body of the text is not under discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:09, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all. Place of death is rarely defining. Rathfelder (talk) 21:20, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Jōdo Shinshū Buddhist monks

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 October 12#Category:Jōdo Shinshū Buddhist monks

Category:Nepalese lyricists

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 October 12#Category:Nepalese lyricists

Category:Emotional and behavioral disorders in childhood and adolescence

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. ✗plicit 10:36, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: upmerge as the scope of the two categories is largely overlapping. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:18, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Strongly support - EBD is a very very US term (I studied psych in Australia, with a particular focus on childhood disorders, and I had never heard this term before editing WP), and while it has been equated to the ICD codes in the category, realistically its a far more poorly defined term. Whereas CPD is directly based on ICD codes, is more immediately recognisable internationally, and is more concise. And, as Marcocapelle said, they have the same scope. They are both defined in the lead as "Generally, diseases outlined within the ICD-10 codes F90–F98 within Chapter V: Mental and behavioural disorders should be included in this category." The exact same codes. --Xurizuri (talk) 22:00, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Indian film singers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. ✗plicit 10:36, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The article is Playback singer. Some of the country categories are "Playback singers" and some "film singers", but as far as I can tell these are the same thing. Category:Indian film singers is much the biggest category. If its agreed this should be changed the remaining 3 can be done speedily. Rathfelder (talk) 13:57, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per
    Oculi (talk) 19:20, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Nine-cylinder engines

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename Category:Two-cylinder engines to Category:Twin-cylinder engines, keep the rest (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 18:17, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This is the logical extension of
MOS:NUMERAL
is irrelevant here anyway, since it says "Generally, in article text", and since consistency is the overarching goal in category space, and that all categories in a series should be either all words, or all numerals.
Pinging all participants in that discussion:
dgaf)  13:22, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
@
dgaf)  18:08, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
Two-cylinder engines contains:
  1. Category:Inline-twin engines
  2. Category:V-twin engines
  3. Straight-twin engine
  4. V-twin engine
  5. Ducati L-twin engine
  6. no page nor category containing "two"
Shouldn't we then rename
dgaf)  18:16, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
Oculi (talk) 20:48, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
@
dgaf)  18:08, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
Well, that rather depends on context, doesn't it? No Great Shaker (talk) 19:20, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your argument, "because single digit numbers should be worded in titles", is not context-dependent, so I suggest improving it.   ~ 
dgaf)  19:44, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
  • In all fairness, the categories under 10 cylinders have not been discussed thoroughly in the previous discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:19, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Bangladeshi film singers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 18:25, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only content is Category:Bangladeshi playback singers - adequately categorised. Rathfelder (talk) 13:14, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Nepalese film singers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 18:27, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only content is Category:Nepalese playback singers, alrerady adequately categorised. Rathfelder (talk) 13:13, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Segments from Fantasia

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 October 11#Category:Segments from Fantasia

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2021_October_3&oldid=1073193252"