Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 27

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log

August 27

Category:Washington Spirit non-playing staff

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep.
(non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 09:19, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: Clearly a redundant category and should be merged. Seany91 (talk) 19:39, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Medieval Tunisian people by occupation

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's ). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 14:06, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: merge per
WP:SMALLCAT, only 1, 2 or 3 articles per category. A second merge target is not needed in the former four cases, where all articles are already in a century subcategory of Category:People of Ifriqiya
.
If not merged, rename "Tunisian" to "of Ifriqyia" per
WP:C2C and per consensus in this earlier discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:49, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
I added two categories more on 29 August. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:03, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support all these. Tunisia didnt exist then. Rathfelder (talk) 21:12, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, but better to rename to Foo of the medieval Islamic world. Just Islam is very inprecise, better to use the full medieval Islamic world. --Privybst (talk) 20:33, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Renaming the targets requires a separate discussion and I notice you meanwhile started that discussion elsewhere. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:58, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:1945 establishments in East Germany

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 4#Category:1945 establishments in East Germany

Category:8th-century establishments in Tahiti

Subcats of Category:Ukrainian raions abolished during the 2020 administrative reform‎

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/delete all. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 14:23, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
more former raions
more former raion subcategories
Nominator's rationale: delete, there is nothing wrong with parent category Category:Ukrainian raions abolished during the 2020 administrative reform‎ with 369 articles about former raions. However, a limited (58) number of these former raions have their own categories populated with current things (populated places and football clubs, mostly) and that does not make much sense. Current places and football clubs belong in a category of a current administrative division, not a former one. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:42, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Current places should not be categorised by their former administrative master. 15:56, 28 August 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laurel Lodged (talkcontribs)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Griffin Communications

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 4#Category:Griffin Communications

Category:Yeomen

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 14:10, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: I see absolutely no point to this category. It collects articles with no relation to each other except for a word. It is of no use to navigation whatsoever. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:32, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose It is a long-standing social class. Dimadick (talk) 06:06, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Indeed it was. But it's not being used for people who were in the social class, which is highly subjective in any case. It's just being used to collect all articles which have "yeoman" or "yeomen" in the title. We don't usually keep categories like that. What's the point to them? -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:19, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep but purge of people. I cannot see why Kincard is in this at all. Broughton ought to be in a regimental category for King's Body Guard of the Yeoman of the Guard. I recall reading that yeoman of the signals was a role in the British navy and would need a subcat, if it could be populated. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:11, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Yeoman (disambiguation) in article space. There are too many completely different uses of the word yeoman to merit a category. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:06, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 21:38, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 05:48, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Companies operating former Boston and Maine Corporation lines

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 4#Category:Companies operating former Boston and Maine Corporation lines

Category:People of the Russian Empire

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 4#Category:People of the Russian Empire