Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 May 29

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log
< May 28 May 30 >

May 29

Category:Sellwood, Portland, Oregon

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:25, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: Per parent article:
navbox should be moved as well for consistency? --Another Believer (Talk) 22:20, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:36, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support, the article was moved over a year ago, that should be long enough. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:35, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Leaders of American trade unions

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No Consensus to rename. - jc37 08:39, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Many American trade unions operate outside of the United States as internationals and are not strictly "American trade unions." To clear this up, I recommend renaming and purging this category of unionists who are American nationals. User:Namiba 17:15, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think the location of the union is more significant that the nationality of its leader. Maybe we should rename Category:Trade union leaders by nationality to make that clearer.Rathfelder (talk) 08:44, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose -- The present name is clear. The target is not. The important thing is the main location of the union, not the nationality of its leader. Even if it has international operations too, it is still an "American" Union. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:02, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Most of these are by definition international unions. Some of the leaders are in fact not even US nationals. Sorting people by the location of the organization they work for is not typical as far as I can tell. We sort individuals based on their nationality. The other option is to delete this category altogether, which is also acceptable to me.--User:Namiba 12:42, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Category:American trade unionists, this is the far better populated category. We do not need a fork, both categories contain union leaders. (It is unlikely that mere passive membership of a union is even mentioned in an article.) Marcocapelle (talk) 07:20, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am comfortable with a merge (and rename) but we should nominate the whole tree to do so.--User:Namiba 13:18, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Surely this category for the person who actually leads the trade union. As opposed to ordinary trade unionists, which includes trade union officials and activists who do not actually lead it, who are categorised as trade unionists if it's a major part of their life. It's therefore not a fork, but a subcat. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:41, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JBchrch talk 14:54, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reflecting on this further, I think this category should be renamed but containerized.--User:Namiba 12:50, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename American is meant to modify the person not the organization.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:25, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Many American trade unions operate outside of the United States as internationals and are not strictly "American trade unions." Actually, most of them are only "international" inasmuch as they may also have branches in Canada. "International" is just a common fiction used in American trade union titles to imply they're more important than they really are. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:46, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agree with that, the question whether this about nationality of the leader or about the location of the organization is a non-discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:21, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:36, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as ambiguous or merge to Category:American trade unionists. ― Qwerfjkltalk 18:30, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:City councillors

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:31, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: Many of the subcategories include councillors from places which are not cities. The anchor article is Councillor. Rathfelder (talk) 09:59, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose the article "councillor" covers various different types of councillor. If these categories are to be not a grabbag of various kinds of councillor, they should keep "city" in their names. Or if you want to broaden it a little, it could be called "municipal". But there are other forms of councillor that are not related to urban or settle areas, like county councillors, which would include rural regions. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 17:08, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • They are already "a grabbag of various kinds of councillor", including plenty of county councillors. If we want to differentiate them that needs to be done on a country basis. What counts as a city varies from country to country and over time as does the structure of local government. Or possibly the whole thing should be merged into Category:Local political office-holders by country. Rathfelder (talk) 10:34, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Alt rename to "municipal councillors" per anon and per several of the subcategories. Municipal is broad enough for the content that is currently in the category. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:59, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Category:Local political office-holders by country per Rathfelder. "City" only tends to be a generic term for an urban area in North America. In most parts of the world most urban settlements are actually towns. But many of the people in these categories aren't even town councillors. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:40, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I do not object against merging per se, but then all country subcategories should be merged too. Otherwise we will have one merged top category with two subcategories per country. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:07, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am striking my previous comment as I realize that in every country city councillors may become or remain a subcategory of local office-holders. Marcocapelle (talk) 02:45, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 16:03, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 13:56, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support as nom -- This avoids the difficulty as to what is a city and what only a town. This ought to be a container only. When UK had aldermen, they were part of the council, but the term is now largely obsolete. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Category:Local political office-holders by country. A city vs. town vs. other type of local government distinction isn't useful here — different countries define the status of local communities and even the job titles of local government office-holders in different ways, so it's not particularly helpful to group "city" councillors to the exclusion of "town" councillors or "local authority" councillors or whatever else local politicians might be called. But since Category:Local political office-holders by country already exists, there isn't really a pressing need to rename this — that can already serve as the overall parent, while each country under it can do its own subcategorizing based on its own circumstances and needs. Bearcat (talk) 17:38, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Music memes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. I have checked the contents that were not already categorised in Internet memes, see talk page. – Fayenatic London 21:12, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This seems to be a
non-defining categorization with its current name. An attempt in 2018 to rename
the category to something more defining resulted in no consensus.
I think "Songs in internet memes" or "Songs in memes" makes the defining characteristic less ambiguous and more exact. However, if going into anything more specific is not advisable, I would not be against
blowing it up and starting over as the cat has existed for 8 years. – The Grid (talk) 17:29, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Isn’t a cat an animal? Rosiedanugbtugn (talk) 16:39, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to clarify whether the category should be renamed or deleted.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JBchrch talk 18:28, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 13:51, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Belgian chroniclers

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 28#Category:Belgian chroniclers

Category:Songs in memory of deceased persons

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 17#Category:Songs in memory of deceased persons

Category:Children of Christian VI of Denmark

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:35, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: SMALLCAT ★Trekker (talk) 11:20, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This has already been discussed once here.Ramblersen2 (talk) 11:32, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, as should have happened after the earlier discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Bambi films

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge to parents. – Fayenatic London 22:59, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: SMALLCAT ★Trekker (talk) 11:11, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films featuring Butch (animated character)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:37, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: "Featuring" is not defining. ★Trekker (talk) 10:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The suggested title does not define the scope. Dimadick (talk) 10:38, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Butch is usually not the main character, so I would tend to delete rather than rename. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:12, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Marcocapelle's rationale Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 20:54, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Marcocapelle --Lenticel (talk) 01:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment to closer, I just left a notification of these discussions at
    WT:FILM. Please wait another week before closing or relisting any of these "featuring" nominations. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:42, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films featuring Tex Avery's Big Bad Wolf

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 28#Category:Films featuring Tex Avery's Big Bad Wolf

Category:Films featuring Barney Bear

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 16#Category:Films featuring Barney Bear

Category:Films featuring Mammy Two Shoes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. – Fayenatic London 22:50, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining, these are all pretty much just Tom & Jerry films. ★Trekker (talk) 10:48, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Not clear how a character's filmography is not defining. Dimadick (talk) 10:39, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, it is not defining for the films. The question is not whether it is defining for the character. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:19, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. ― Qwerfjkltalk 18:37, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films featuring Goopy Geer

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. – Fayenatic London 22:50, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: SMALLCAT ★Trekker (talk) 10:41, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films featuring Lola Bunny

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete.
(non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:26, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining. ★Trekker (talk) 10:41, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Not clear how a character's filmography is not defining. Dimadick (talk) 10:39, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Dimadick: you have been on Wikipedia for years now and have been told repeatedly how to and how not to use categories, we've been over this exact topic before with the similar Disney categories.★Trekker (talk) 10:50, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • I have been on Wikipedia since 2001. I disagree with you on what is defining or not. I view the character's filmography as far more defining than information on a film's creators or company. And I would like to recreate the Disney categories. Dimadick (talk) 10:54, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
        • @Dimadick: Doesn't matter how you personally feel, Wikipedia consensus has clearly shown repeatedly that you're in a very small minority on this topic, your insistance on keeping on creating these kinds of categories is borderline disruptive.★Trekker (talk) 10:57, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, it is not defining for the films. The question is not whether it is defining for the character. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:25, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, only real films notable for featuring Lola are
    WP:SMALLCAT. (Oinkers42) (talk) 21:56, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete per
    WP:SMALLCAT --Lenticel (talk) 00:20, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films featuring Piggy

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 28#Category:Films featuring Piggy

Category:Films featuring Sylvester Jr.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:39, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: SMALLCAT and not defining. ★Trekker (talk) 10:38, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films featuring Foxy

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 28#Category:Films featuring Foxy

Category:Films featuring Buddy

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 28#Category:Films featuring Buddy

Category:Films featuring Tweety

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 28#Category:Films featuring Tweety

Category:Films featuring Sylvester the Cat

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 28#Category:Films featuring Sylvester the Cat

Category:Films featuring Porky Pig

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 28#Category:Films featuring Porky Pig

Category:Films featuring Bosko

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 28#Category:Films featuring Bosko

Category:Films featuring Speedy Gonzales

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 28#Category:Films featuring Speedy Gonzales

Category:Films featuring Pepe Le Pew

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 28#Category:Films featuring Pepe Le Pew

Category:Films featuring Bugs Bunny

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 28#Category:Films featuring Bugs Bunny

Category:Films featuring Daffy Duck

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 28#Category:Films featuring Daffy Duck

Category:Tim Burton characters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. – Fayenatic London 11:34, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Standard name ★Trekker (talk) 09:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wes Craven characters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:08, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: Standard naming. ★Trekker (talk) 09:43, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional characters in Quentin Tarantino films

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:08, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: Standard category naming. ★Trekker (talk) 09:42, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Kingdom Hearts characters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Rather than lose or tinker with the links to parents & interwikis, I'm going to implement this by purging the nominated category of everything except the list Characters of Kingdom Hearts and the two sub-cats, and invite the participants to nominate the main sub-cat for renaming/merging. ​​​​ – Fayenatic London 22:25, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining, the child category "Kingdom Hearts original characters" already covers the characters that are defing by this game. ★Trekker (talk) 09:39, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per rationale Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 16:35, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Instead, purge Category:Kingdom Hearts characters of all entries but Donald Duck, Goofy, and possibly Mickey Mouse, then merge up Category:Kingdom Hearts original characters. Donald and Goofy are very important to Kingdom Hearts, and Kingdom Hearts is important to their character's importance in video games. The same is somewhat true for Mickey as well, albeit less so. Also, if Yen Sid ever got an article, he could be included as well. (Oinkers42) (talk) 21:35, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Middle-earth films

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Films set in Middle-earth. – Fayenatic London 11:40, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: More appropriate name, these films are not direct parts of a franchise but adaptations of the legendarium by Tolkien. ★Trekker (talk) 09:25, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:History teachers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Some strong arguments were put forward in favour of the nomination, but failed to gain majority support. Meanwhile, Marcocapelle has expanded Category:Racially motivated violence against white people with 2 new sub-cats, and as a result Category:Anti-white racism by continent and its 3 like-named sub-cats are now pointless layers containing only 1 sub-cat each, so it may be worth renominating those. – Fayenatic London 22:11, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 28#Category:History teachers

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Anti-white racism

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Some strong arguments were put forward in favour of the nomination, but failed to gain majority support. During the discussion, Marcocapelle has expanded Category:Racially motivated violence against white people with 2 new sub-cats, and as a result Category:Anti-white racism by continent and its 3 like-named sub-cats are now pointless layers with only one sub-cat each, so it may be worth renominating those for upmerging. – Fayenatic London 22:14, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Whether or not anti-white sentiment / anti-white prejudice should be referred to as "racist" is controversial. Many scholars, intellectuals, academics, activists, etc. do not consider prejudice against whites to amount to racism because there is no structural oppression of white people. Furthermore, the notion of "anti-white racism" is often used by white nationalist and white supremacist circles to promote racism. I think "Anti-white sentiment" is a less loaded term for this phenomenon. There are other categories with similar titles, such as Category:Anti-European sentiment and Category:Anti-Western sentiment. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 09:43, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
On top of the former, alt2: suggest renaming Category:Anti-white racism in Europe to Category:Racially motivated violence against white Europeans, similar to Category:Racially motivated violence against European Americans and cut the remainder of the tree, since the violence part is all that matters here.
Alt1 can be implemented in conjunction with the nomination, if desired. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:21, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 09:15, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Unnamed anon (talk) 03:39, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Characters in Disney package films

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 28#Category:Characters in Disney package films

Category:Directors of Mickey Mouse short films

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:13, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: Generally people should not be categorized by the franchises/series they have worked on. It is rarely defining. ★Trekker (talk) 08:30, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:History of Argentina by city

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:15, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: merge, presumably the two categories are supposed to have the same scope. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:51, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Vladivostok

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:15, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: merge per
WP:SMALLCAT, only 1-3 articles in each of these categories. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:54, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Non-Indian Gandhians

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Of the current member pages, only Jean-Baptiste Libouban is not in the parent so I will merge it there. – Fayenatic London 11:17, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This is an unnecessary category, sources define people as Gandhians only, not as "Non-Indian Gandhians". I believe all articles in this are already in the upper level Category:Gandhians so it's safe to delete this. —SpacemanSpiff 04:42, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete but rather per
    WP:OPINIONCAT. The same may apply to the parent category, I have not checked yet. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:21, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_May_29&oldid=1130915595"