Wikipedia:Chimera articles

This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.

Shortcut WP:CHIMERA

This page in a nutshell: If two or more subjects have the same name, split them into two separate articles. Don't put them all in the same article.

The

because they do not simply try to point readers at the page they were looking for; instead, they try to write about all of them at once. This is a bad idea. When a reader lands on an article, they should be able to trust that every part of it refers to the same subject. This means that the article can be browsed at random without excessive confusion. It helps editors for the same reason.

Chimera articles are similar to

, but the distinction is that Frankenstein articles are accidental (created due to improper diligence when gathering material from sources), where chimera articles are deliberate (created out of the impression that similar but distinct subjects are okay being given the same article).

By far the best alternative is to split the subjects up into different pages, linked by

and/or a separate disambiguation page.

• Wikipedia:Ambiguous subjects
• Wikipedia:Broad-concept articles
• Wikipedia:Don't build the Frankenstein
• Wikipedia:Summary style