Wikipedia:Communication is required

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
All Wikipedians are expected to communicate with others when needed.

Wikipedia's hallmark is its user-generated,

good-faith effort to use talk pages
to discuss issues when needed.

Reverting

Sometimes a situation requires MORE talk and LESS action.

If you are trying to improve content (and not simply reverting

one-on-one negotiations, requesting a third opinion, and asking for help at one of the many Wikipedia:Noticeboards
.

Restoring your edits multiple times without consensus is a form of

blocked
. You have two options: make a good-faith effort to discuss and wait for consensus before any further action, or stop reverting completely. There is no third option.

Formal noticeboards

When attention has been drawn to your actions on one of the noticeboards such as

the edit-warring noticeboard
, it is generally in your best interest to engage in the discussion, although it is not mandatory. In addition to being an opportunity for you to present your side, your willingness to co-operate with others is essential to reaching an amicable solution. Although it can be tempting to respond to everyone in detail, it may be more effective to allow contributors to express their views without interruption, and provide a few simple responses.

Repeated complaints by multiple editors

If you are getting multiple complaints on your talk page or on an article talk page about your editing,

fly under the radar
" may eventually result in a block.

Slow-motion edit warring

If you regularly restore your edits to a page without consensus, even within the limits of the

three-revert rule
, you are still edit warring and once it catches the eye of an administrator, you are likely to be sanctioned. Stop restoring your edits, and start a discussion on the talk page to establish consensus. Often, it requires compromise.

Good faith

"Good faith" means treating the other person as an equal when discussing.

Everyone is expected to make a good-faith effort to discuss disagreements with involved editors. It may require compromise, finding

consensus
forms.

Remember that Wikipedia is open for everyone regardless of their location or background. Be prepared to understand and accept that you may be collaborating with someone on the other side of the globe who has completely different cultural values and opinions.

Conclusion

Everyone must be willing to talk to others sometimes. Some people have gone long periods without discussion, but only because they didn't do anything controversial. Most people who edit for more than a few months will find they need to explain or question others occasionally; they must communicate in a

civil fashion. Being unwilling to discuss with others when it is needed is inconsistent with our goals
as a collaborative project.

See also

Notes

  1. wiki markup
    you are using, and changing templates within articles.