Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 November 16

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

16 November 2010

Cleared items, including SCV log
Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2010-11-16 Edit

2010-11-16 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • talk) 20:45, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • talk) 20:47, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Still kindof close, but I think it's clean enough. VernoWhitney (talk) 12:09, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. History restored for attribution. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:58, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:54, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Deleted and recreated clean. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:01, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --MLauba (Talk) 10:51, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. MLauba (Talk) 11:20, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. MLauba (Talk) 11:29, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Copyright concerns remain. Article deleted or tagged for speedy deletion. MLauba (Talk) 09:58, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Copyright concerns remain. Article deleted, left CUP notice. No permission obtained --MLauba (Talk) 11:35, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
    ]

 Done -- copyvio text removed. CactusWriter (talk) 16:30, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
See diff from April 28. User warned (6 months late). - CETTALK 01:02, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. What a pain in the backside. Took me 10 minutes to figure why Twinkle's "restore to this version" never worked - old version contained a link to a site now blacklisted. Ugh. --MLauba (Talk) 13:31, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. MLauba (Talk) 14:36, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • talk) 00:22, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --MLauba (Talk) 09:58, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • talk) 00:22, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • User was not notified, relisting under today's entry. --MLauba (Talk) 10:05, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • talk) 00:22, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --MLauba (Talk) 10:47, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • talk) 00:22, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • talk) 00:22, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --MLauba (Talk) 10:47, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]



  • talk) 00:22, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • I have not been able to find a source. I think it's possible that this was a student paper, a "review" of specifically "Chan, J.M., Lang, R., Rispoli, M., O’Reilly, M., Sigafoos, J., Cole, H. (2009). "Use of peer-mediated interventions in the treatment of autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review." Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3, 876-889." I've removed the copy-paste tag, but placed the cv-unsure at the talk page. I've also rewritten quite a bit. Not enough, if it's a copyvio. :) I didn't redo it from scratch, but I attempted to make it less confusing. If nothing else, the new lead ought to be usable! --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:54, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]