Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 October 5

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

5 October 2010

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2010-10-05 Edit

2010-10-05 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Deleted and recreated clean. VernoWhitney (talk) 00:03, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Permission plausible Article blanked and contributor notified how to proceed. An administrator should delete if permission is not verified within five to seven days of the timestamp. VernoWhitney (talk) 11:46, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 00:16, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. VernoWhitney (talk) 11:52, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 00:27, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:58, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Permission plausible Article blanked and contributor notified how to proceed. An administrator should delete if permission is not verified within five to seven days of the timestamp. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:15, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 12:16, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redhouse, Sunderland. CSBot reporting at 16:10, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • talk) 17:09, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 12:01, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:14, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:09, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 12:21, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:23, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:17, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:13, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • J. Steward Davis (history · last edit) from Maryland State Archives. Note: The article was created by User:Ecpclio who self-identifies as the Maryland State Archivist. I've waded through the archive website and have not found any statement which specifically states "public domain" use or permits commercial use per our copyright license. I need another pair of eyes to see if I'm missing something here. — CactusWriter (talk) 20:30, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Email and name match up with the head-honcho of the website, so I imagine it's just a matter of getting him to send in permission to OTRS. It looks like that may involve us emailing him though, given that he appears to be relatively inactive. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:46, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • CC-BY-SA. The release was actually placed on the website, as he indicated it would be; I've noted my visual confirmation of that in the OTRS ticket. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:37, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Oh, dear. The rewrite retains the arrangement of the original. I'm not sure why. I should think that this would be usable if it were alphabetical (now that the numbers have been removed). Can anybody see any logical reason for the organization that might make it okay for us to copy it? --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:58, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
They're in order of "site code" whatever that is - I'm not sure if it's order of establishment or what. There doesn't seem to be an obvious explanation provided on the site. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:28, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've asked the contributor at his talk page if he'd mind alphabetizing, unless he can explain what makes this logical and uncreative. Relisted t permit time to address. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:05, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:30, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Articlecreated by copy and paste in 2005! Non-infringing stub created. PamD (talk) 14:07, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Thanks. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:28, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:26, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2010_October_5&oldid=1138425784"