Wikipedia:Correspondence off-wiki
This is a failed proposal. Consensus for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use the talk page or initiate a thread at the village pump. |
This page in a nutshell: With the exception of information covered in the Wikimedia privacy policy, do not consider Wikipedia-related correspondence to be confidential. |
Correspondence and communications between or among editors or third parties, such as
bans
, co-ordinated editing) may be revealed by any recipient at any time without reprisal, with the following exclusions.
Exclusions
In cases where a person who has received correspondence feels that such correspondence should be shared on Wikipedia, the Wikimedia privacy policy continues to apply.
Correspondence that directly relates to the project should not be considered private with the exceptions listed below:
- Do not post on-site any material that can contains policy.
- The complete text of OTRS emails should not be posted without the express permission of the author. In some cases (such as when responding to OTRSmessages) it may be possible to discuss the existence and content of a private message without revealing the actual content, but this should be done with caution.
- Correspondence between two individuals that is unrelated to actions taken on Wikipedia.
- Correspondence that is sent or received with the explicit expectation of confidentiality, e.g. Arbcom-land Checkuser-l.
Gossip discouraged
Of course, the posting of off-wiki correspondence on Wikipedia is discouraged unless it benefits the project.
Paraphrasing encouraged
Consideration should be given to paraphrasing the correspondence or quoting excerpts rather than the entirety of the correspondence.
See also
- Wikipedia:Privacy
- Wikipedia:Harassment
- Wikipedia:Private correspondence (rejected proposal)
- Wikipedia:Confidential evidence (rejected proposal)
- Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Durova#Removal of private correspondence