Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 April 13

Lexie Marie (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)

I performed a non-admin closure of the debate as keep. User:Hipocrite posted on my talk page, saying this closure was incorrect, saying "PORNBIO is not nearly unanimous." After I performed the closure of this debate, Hipocrite tagged WP:PORNBIO as disputed. I have no problem with PORNBIO changing, but I do feel that the closure I performed was correct. I present the case for scrutiny (I would like to know if I'm wrong). Jujutacular ^T · C 16:21, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A pointy abuse of DRV, but NAC is not acceptable for a 2d-3k close as keep. Hipocrite (talk) 16:25, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please, I'm truly not trying to disrupt. I would simply like to know if others agree that I am wrong. Jujutacular ^T · C 16:27, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You were wrong. I re-opened the AfD.

Tan | 39 16:35, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you. For future reference, was I wrong because of the PORNBIO dispute, or because it was 3 for keep, 2 for delete? Jujutacular ^T · C 17:03, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because NAC are for clearcut cases and 3K2D is always going to require interpretation.

Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:13, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Crown Room Club Locations (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore)

<REASON> Dew Kane (talk) 03:51, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Can you please provide your reason for this page to be undeleted? Stifle (talk) 10:49, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• I already left a message to the user at their talk page asking them to expand on this. Perhaps we should close this without predjudice to relisting when the nom has something to say? I can't do that myself because I participated in the AFD.
  Spartaz ^Humbug! 12:24, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Somehow, out of a technical problem, my reason did not show up on my first attempt. But I am bringing this up here because there were 5 keeps and 4 deletes (considering that my vote was worded as "rename" but is meant as a keep). The arguments given for keep are more in-depth than the deletes and altogether put forth a stronger case. Dew Kane (talk) 04:00, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• I'm afraid I don't agree with you, Dew Kane. I don't think the argument for deletion was refuted at all, and I endorse the close.—S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 17:59, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Endorse per my comments in the AFD.
  Spartaz ^Humbug! 04:00, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Endorse,
  WP:NOT#DIR is a powerful argument, and User:Dew Kane is laboring under the misapprehension that AfDs are closed by vote counting. Abductive (reasoning) 05:25, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Endorse. AFD is not a vote, that's why it was renamed many moons ago from
  Wikipedia:Votes for deletion. Stifle (talk) 08:40, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

File:Chinese_Division_Table.png (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (article|XfD|restore)

Relist for deletion as all uses have now been removed. More information is available as described here Chrismiceli (talk) 01:45, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Just relist it at FFD or speak to the closing admin. There is no need to bring this to DRV.
  Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:58, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • I attempted to contact the closing admin here with no success. I thought this would be the next place to bring the discussion before relisting. I have now relisted at FFD per your suggestion here --Chrismiceli (talk) 14:57, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]