Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 February 28
28 February 2010
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
I am 7shaquan and not to long ago a posted an article about the American Actress Ciara Bravo who is known as Katie on the nick show big time rush. Sadly my post was delted by an admin Cirt and he has also been deleting other articles of this name at a constant rate without a firm foundation on why he is doing so. I have asked him nicely to repost, but he continues to deny. He says that the article does not meet the notary standards, but I have managed more than once to prove this statement wrong to him, but he continues to be stubborn and so i ask you to please repost my article and show me that wiki is the civilized community it is thought to be —Preceding unsigned comment added by 7shaquan (talk • contribs) 22:46, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Something else you can look at to determine the notary of the person is of coarse their twitter account, look at all of her followers:[3] If thats not enough for you then just look at the youtube vids being created for her:[4] [5] [6] And last but not least to show some of the media she has starred in: [7] [8] [9] Now Will you reconsider, are those enough references for you--7shaquan (talk) 02:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Here is another link that mentions her as a main character on big time rush [10] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 7shaquan (talk • contribs) 03:13, 1 March 2010 (UTC) Just another article[11][12]--7shaquan (talk) 03:20, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
While the arguments given at the CfD were quite reasonable, two important aspects were omitted: Australasia ecozone – it is cited that "Australasia has been used as a name for combined Australia/New Zealand sporting teams". This is reason enough to warrant an own category because otherwise there's no correct place to put the respective articles. ]
To further elaborate on the former aspect: It is not easy to implement a somewhat consistent category scheme for geopolitical regions, which is why supranational categorization is mostly limited to continents and still fragmentary. The best way we can go is using an acknowledged scheme like the United Nations geoscheme, and this requires this one category to exist, either as "Australasia" or as "Australia and New Zealand". I personally prefer the former. PanchoS (talk) 15:11, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Deleted under false assumptions
Restore Simple Instant Messenger and move it to Sim-IM! Don't restore Serverless Instant Messenger! --phobie (talk) 04:19, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |