Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 January 29

The word alive – deletion and salting endorsed but with no objection to userfication on request. Thryduulf (talk) 12:02, 7 February 2010 (UTC) – Thryduulf (talk) 12:02, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.

Tyler "Telle" Smith, already has an individual page, and so does Craig Mabbitt, who started the band. Also one of their songs made an appearance in the Tap Tap Revenge game, which seems notable enough, besides the fact that they are also signed to Fearless Records. Mcrfobrockr (talk) 21:29, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Userfy for Mcrfobrockr, and let's see what he can make of it before moving it to mainspace. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:05, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, but at the moment the mainspace is blocked due to the recreation of the page. Mcrfobrockr (talk) 22:03, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse
salting. If you think this band is now notable, write a draft with sources. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 00:04, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Endorse speedy deletion under
The word alive. –Black Falcon ^(talk) 23:16, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.

DeskAway – deletion endorsed. Thryduulf (talk) 12:04, 7 February 2010 (UTC) – Thryduulf (talk) 12:04, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.

Spartaz (talk · contribs

) deleted the page DeskAway citing the reason as:‎ (G4: Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion: extra source looks like a regurgitated press release, Notability concerns not yet met. please submit draft to DRV if you wish to restore this to mains)

Why should there be notability concerns when we had given links of leading Indian newspapers, TV channel interviews, leading global blogs that have reviewed the software. I looked at the wiki pages of other similar software as this one, you can see them here:

list of project management software. I could not find any 'more' credible sources for those softwares either. I think the page needs to be undeleted and please review whether the sources cited are really lacking in notability! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smoldee (talk • contribs) 08:25, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Cannot see the second version, so unable to comment on the appropriateness of the second deletion but the request to submit a userfied draft to DRV is appropriate after looking at the concerns raised at the first AfD, thus I endorse that decision. The deleted material should be returned to the editor's userspace if the editor wishes to present it here. J04n(talk page) 10:42, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
After reading the deleted material I endorse the second deletion as well. Essentially the article is unchanged since the AfD with the only new reference, being a fluff piece about the creator of the subject as opposed to the subject itself. J04n(talk page) 04:22, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The deleted material is now back at
Spartaz ^Humbug! 15:03, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Endorse speedy deletion upon examination of the deleted material. The few sources provided do not in my view confer notability under
WP:CSD#G4 was applicable. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 00:04, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Endorse continued deletion. Nothing sufficient to overturn the deletion consensus has been presented. Eluchil404 (talk) 21:25, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.