Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2014 July 11
11 July 2014
|
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Fleischmann-Pons experiment) but in this case the disproportionate coverage is quite elaborate.[5] The response again fails to address split criteria or those for notability. I should note I'm not a new user, I just edit from my ip. It's wonderful. There are 100 000 usable sources, but with the exception of a nobel laureate, not one constructive editor survived the cold fusion article, they all got exterminated. 1000 admins looked at this, not one dared to ban any of these foul mouthed wiki stalkers. This article and its editors are subject to Wikipedia general sanctions. I'm almighty curious if you have what it takes to implement that, I confess to have extremely little faith in the admin lottery. The last one I ran into violated 5 out of 5:[6] of the applicable guidelines:[7] A most impressive score. Maybe I will get lucky with you. hehehe. Either way, good luck and have a nice day. 84.106.11.117 (talk) 06:24, 11 July 2014 (UTC) ]
|
| The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |