Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/British Isles/archive1

British Isles

Superbly referenced and structured. The high level of discussion and debate on the article has resulted in an article of high integrity and qualityBjF 22:15, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Surely it would be best to resolve the merge question before a nomination. Jkelly 22:20, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object ref formatting needs work. One displays only the external jump number. Some footnotes are not at the end of punctuation where they should be (not in the sentence and no space after the punctuation), solo years should not be wikilinked-only full dates, the bigblock quotes with blue marks are distracting, the merge should be settled before nominating, and the footnote with the citation tag needs fixed.Rlevse 00:41, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Object. The article is not stable and nowhere near ready for FAC. Rhion 17:35, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment While assuming good faith, I wonder if BjF has enough experience to nominate the several articles for FAC that he or she has- contributions page here [1]. MAG1 20:42, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Object. Poorly structured and appalling standard of writing --Khendon 09:47, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]