Wikipedia:Featured article review/Anna May Wong/archive1
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 3:54, 9 July 2022 (UTC) [1].
Anna May Wong
- Notified: WikiProject Women's history, 7 May
Review section
Talk page notice: The lead does not meet MOS:LEAD and there are sourcing issues. I'm not convinced that news articles from the 1930s are high-quality reliable sources when there are a ton of scholarly sources out there. Article can't be considered well-researched given that it doesn't incorporate the new 2019 scholarly biography by Shirley Jennifer Lim.
No improvement or response so here we are (t · c) buidhe 03:29, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC No progress, comprehensive concerns remain. Z1720 (talk) 14:15, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, no improvment. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:27, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
- Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and comprehensiveness. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:15, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, no improvement. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:34, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, issues remain unaddressed. Hog Farm Talk 04:33, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist no edits since moved to FARC, concerns remain. Z1720 (talk) 22:07, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:54, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
The lead does not meet MOS:LEAD and there are sourcing issues. I'm not convinced that news articles from the 1930s are high-quality reliable sources when there are a ton of scholarly sources out there. Article can't be considered well-researched given that it doesn't incorporate the new 2019 scholarly biography by Shirley Jennifer Lim.