Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Angel Aquino on screen and stage/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [1].[reply]

Angel Aquino on screen and stage

Angel Aquino on screen and stage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Featured list candidates/Angel Aquino on screen and stage/archive1

Nominator(s): Pseud 14 (talk) 19:09, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

After recently expanding the main article of Filipina actress Angel Aquino, here's a list of her performances in film, television and stage which I've compiled and tailored to other filmography FLs. Happy to address your comments and thanks to all who take the time to review the list. Pseud 14 (talk) 19:09, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dank

• Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly
  AGF
  on sourcing.
• "she again played the antagonistic part of a vindictive ex-wife": Had she played a vindictive ex-wife before? If not, then maybe: "She again played a vindictive antagonist, this time as the ex-wife ..." (Done)
• "A Lullaby to the Sorrowful Mystery" needs to sort under "L". I don't think it makes much difference, but I'd sort "Rich Woman" under R.
• In ref #62, things are italicized that shouldn't be.
• Checking the
  FLC criteria
  :
• 1. I've skimmed the prose and made minor edits; feel free to revert or discuss. I checked sorting on all sortable columns and sampled the links in the tables.
• 2. The lead meets
  WP:LEAD
  and defines the inclusion criteria.
• 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
• 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the
  UPSD
  tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
• 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
• 4. It is navigable.
• 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the one image seems fine.
• 6. It is stable.
• Close enough for a support. Well done. You might be interested in reviewing List of nitrogen-fixing-clade families. - Dank (push to talk) 02:05, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for taking this review and for your support Dank. I have actioned all your comments. I'd be happy to have a look at your FLC as well. Pseud 14 (talk) 02:43, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks much. Actually ... if you could hold off, I might be restructuring that list soon. If I do, I'll post here. - Dank (push to talk) 02:56, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Sure thing. Ping me when it’s ready. Pseud 14 (talk) 03:13, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      • @Pseud 14, it's ready, I didn't make any changes. (There will be a minor change to my next nomination instead.) - Dank (push to talk) 12:20, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• "She made her screen debut with a minor role in the action drama Mumbaki (1996).[1] She went on to appear...." - I would join these two short sentences together
• "Her first television appearance was as a presenter in the lifestyle show" => "Her first television appearance was as a presenter of the lifestyle show"
• "Also in 2013, she returned on stage" => "Also in 2013, she returned to the stage"
• Think that's it :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:12, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for your review ChrisTheDude. All comments have been actioned. Pseud 14 (talk) 17:40, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:59, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aoba47

• I have a question about this part, "who has appeared extensively in film, television, and stage productions". Why is the "extensively" part necessary? I can see that she has starred in a lot of films, but it seems like a good portion of her television work is guest spots and she has only appeared in two stage productions. Is she notable for appearing in abnormally high amount of productions?

I have removed it.

• Thank you for addressing this point.
  Aoba47 (talk) 22:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• I have a question about this part, "and starred with Isabelle Huppert in the psychological thriller Captive". Why is it necessary to point out one of her co-stars? It is not done (unless I missed something) in any other areas of the lead, and I do not see why her appearing in a film with Huppert is notable enough to highlight and give weight in the lead.

Filipino actors very seldom collaborate with foreign and multi-awarded actors such as the likes of Isabelle Huppert. I think collaborations with thespians such as Huppert is, to a certain extent, notable for Aquino's profile and would somehow be worthy of mentioning.

• I am not fully convinced by this explanation, but it is not a major point and will not hold up my review.
  Aoba47 (talk) 22:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Her appearance in the Swan Dive music video is not mentioned in the lead. While I am sure this is more minor in the grand scheme of her career, it just seems a little off to have a separate section that is not mentioned in the lead at all.

I have tailored these with FL filmographies such as as those of

Jessica Chastain, Amy Adams, and Cate Blanchett

. These actresses, for the most part, have appeared in music videos or video games in special, guest or voice roles but none have been mentioned in the lead since more weight is given to their film, television, and stage work. I believe there is no absolute rule for "music video" appearances in particular, that it should be mentioned in the lead. Its inclusion overall would still be acceptable since it is still considered a "screen" appearance.

• Fair enough. I just thought it was odd to have a complete section not mentioned in the lead, but I see your point, especially if the music video appearance was minor in the grand scheme of her career, so this should be fine by me.
  Aoba47 (talk) 22:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Thank you for taking up this review

Aoba47. I have provided my responses to your comments. Let me know if they are to your satisfaction. I will endeavor to provide my comments on your PR this weekend, as I am currently traveling with very spotty internet. Pseud 14 (talk) 18:50, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

• Thank you for your responses. I support this FLC for promotion based on the prose. Take as much time as you need. I plan on keeping the peer review up until the end of the month at least so do not feel like you have to rush or anything. Safe travels!
  Aoba47 (talk) 22:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Fixed, so that all YouTube links to the ABS-CBN Entertainment channel are written as such.

Thanks for the media review on my current FAC and I'd appreciate anything re: prose. I can tell this is a really high-quality list and the lead section looks really well-researched. Great work!--NØ 07:49, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking up this review MaranoFan. Appreciate the kind words. I'll be down to review your FAC on prose (soon as I return from traveling this weekend). Pseud 14 (talk) 12:17, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to support this list for a well-deserved promotion to FL. I think I can pass the source review as well, since it has a clear, consistent ref formatting and all of the information is supported by the sources.--NØ 04:00, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support and really appreciate you doing a review of the sources too MaranoFan. Pseud 14 (talk) 13:03, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: This
  WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:08, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]