Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Bibliography of E.W. Hornung/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 10:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Bibliography of E.W. Hornung
)
Toolbox |
---|
Resolved comments from Lemonade51 (talk) 16:26, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
Many thanks Lemonade51; all points now covered, I think. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 05:03, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply] |
Support – Fine list. Lemonade51 (talk) 16:26, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Many thanks Lemonade51: very much obliged for your thoughts and time on this! Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 06:43, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Cassianto (Talk) 14:12, 02 January 2014 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
Cassianto comments
|
Support – per above resolved comments. I will leave the technical stuff to those who know. Superb work as always! -- CassiantoTalk 07:34, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support – I rarely engage with FLC, and have had to refresh my memory about the criteria. I believe this article meets them all. A few minor quibbles, not affecting my support, but possibly worth considering:
"In 1893 …his friend Sir Arthur Conan Doyle" – not Sir Arthur until 1902, and you don't need two blue links to him in successive paras.
- Quite right - the second link was an oversight after dealing with one of Cassianto's comments: now tweaked to show "Hornung dedicated the book to his friend, the writer Arthur Conan Doyle" on the first instance, and slimmed down and de-linked on the second. - SchroCat (talk) 17:16, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ypres – worth a blue link, perhaps
Blue links in tables – I notice you link things on every occurrence (e.g. seven "Cornhill Magazines" in succession). Is this the usual protocol for tables? Fine, if so. I merely mention it, but there's quite a lot of bright blue hitting the eyeballs.
Info-box - "Books - 2"? Non-fiction books, it turns out. Perhaps clarify
That's all from me. I am sceptical about info-boxes as a rule, but the one here is a great benefit – pithy and elegant. Bravo! – Tim riley (talk) 16:18, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:29, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.