Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Grace Kelly on screen and stage/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 19 September 2022 (UTC) [1].[reply]

Grace Kelly on screen and stage

Grace Kelly on screen and stage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Featured list candidates/Grace Kelly on screen and stage/archive1

Nominator(s): Cowlibob (talk) 19:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Grace Kelly was one of the leading actors of Classical Hollywood cinema, here is a list of her roles. As always I welcome all constructive criticism on how to improve it. Cowlibob (talk) 19:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

The only thing I can think to suggest is clarifying that Alfred Hitchcock was the director of the named films, as some people might not know what "Alfred Hitchcock thrillers" means. Other that that, nothing to mention :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:30, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisTheDude: Amended. Thanks. Cowlibob (talk) 19:46, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 06:47, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dank

• Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly
  AGF
  on sourcing.
• Checking the
  FLC criteria
  :
• 1. I've done a little copyediting; feel free to revert or discuss. I checked sorting on all sortable columns and sampled the links in the tables.
• 2. The lead meets
  WP:LEAD
  and defines the inclusion criteria.
• 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
• 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the
  UPSD
  tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
• 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
• 4. It is navigable.
• 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine.
• 6. It is stable.
• Support. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 02:52, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • A little explanation on this edit of mine: I'm not faulting your work; you used a format that's common in featured lists of filmographies, and some people like it that way. To me, it feels like a
    MOS:FIRST violation, so I went with a different format that's also common in featured lists, such as Bruce Willis filmography and List of Kate Winslet performances. - Dank (push to talk) 10:01, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • And the format at List of roles and awards of Catherine Zeta-Jones also works, I think, if you prefer ... even "[numeral] productions" without breaking it down would work. - Dank (push to talk) 16:21, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dank: Thanks for your comments and edits. Agree it reads better now. Cowlibob (talk) 20:15, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aoba47

• I have a few comments for the sources links for File:Grace Kelly 1956.jpg. The eBay link is dead and the links for the front and back link to a sketchy site that does not appear to support the image.
• The lead's first paragraph uses "The following year" twice which makes the prose rather repetitive.

Everything looks solid. Aside from these two comments, I believe this is ready for promotion. Once everything has been addressed, I will be more than happy to support this nomination. Best of luck with this FLC!

@

Aoba47: Thanks for your comments. I have changed to hopefully a better pic. Made a slight copy edit. Cowlibob (talk) 20:16, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you for addressing everything. I'd be curious on why

Aoba47 (talk) 20:22, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

@

Aoba47: I've changed up the photo to a promotional one for Rear Window. I agree her work with Hitchcock is what she is remembered for. Cowlibob (talk) 18:10, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you for addressing this point. I love the photo that you have chosen.

Aoba47 (talk) 18:18, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

• Source review – All of the references appear to be reliable and well-formatted, and the link-checker tool isn't showing any concerns. Giants2008 (Talk) 01:26, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: This
  WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:13, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]