Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of FA Community Shield matches/archive1

• Lead image caption is fragment so no full stop required.

• Done. —Bloom6132 (talk) 17:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Isn't there a tournament style infobox that could be used here or do you think that's unnecessary...?

• It appears the trend for English football tournaments is to include an infobox for the main article (e.g. FA Cup, EFL Cup, FA Community Shield, etc.), while not including one in the list of winners (e.g. List of FA Cup finals, List of EFL Cup finals, etc.). However, those lists were promoted almost a decade ago, and I'm not aware of any changes to consensus on this issue. —Bloom6132 (talk) 17:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• " champions of the Premier League and the winners of the FA Cup. " this is the current arrangement, as you expand later, perhaps you can make that clear here too?

• Added "presently contested between …" in the first sentence. —Bloom6132 (talk) 19:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• You don't mention that the FA in the title means Football Association, nor relate the trophy to that organisation...

• Specified in the first sentence that they are the organisers. —Bloom6132 (talk) 18:21, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Don't think you need to link Canada.

• Changed. —Bloom6132 (talk) 17:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Double is overlinked (and differently).

• Fixed. —Bloom6132 (talk) 17:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• "runner-up finishes " feels like an odd turn of phrase for the losers of a one-off cup contest...

• You're right; got the wording off List of UEFA Super Cup matches. Changed to "losses". —Bloom6132 (talk) 18:21, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• "The 2017 edition will be contested by Chelsea and Arsenal." probably needs a citation and worth just saying it'll be at Wembley once again...

• Done. —Bloom6132 (talk) 17:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Any thoughts on the criticism of the contest as reasonably meaningless? This article is mildly interesting in that regard.

• Yes – I've added several refs to support that criticism and juxtaposed it with several historical moments in the final paragraph. —Bloom6132 (talk) 00:15, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Brighton and Huddersfield need A's in their FCs in the summary table.

• Done for Huddersfield. I thought Brighton & Hove Albion F.C. were simply "F.C." —Bloom6132 (talk) 17:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man (talk) 11:49, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: thanks for your feedback; I hope I've addressed your comments satisfactorily. —Bloom6132 (talk) 00:15, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]