Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by The Hateful Eight/archive1
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 22 November 2021 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of accolades received by The Hateful Eight
List of accolades received by The Hateful Eight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): talk) 14:55, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
talk) 14:55, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- Image caption is a complete sentence so should have a full stop
- In the recipient column, the film's title sorts under T when it should sort under H
- When sorting the result column, it goes Won > Nominated > 8th > 4th > 2nd, which seems a bit random......
- That's all I got! :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:09, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @talk) 18:25, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I fixed the sorting issue, it was quicker to just do it than type it all here. Now happy to Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:55, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Source review — Pass
- Formatting and reliability of all sources seem fine overall. Just a few suggestions:
- Ref#1 – Do we need IMDb as publisher, and regardless, IMDb is not a reliable source.
- That is added automatically by talk) 11:46, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Can be converted to
{{cite web}}
template as we consistently have not included publisher in the article, but no major issues. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 12:00, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Can be converted to
- That is added automatically by
- Ref#19 – Daily Herald can take "ref access = limited" than subscription.
- That website does not appear to give free articles. talk) 11:46, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- That website does not appear to give free articles.
- Same goes with Ref#38
- Same here ("26 WEEKS FOR 99¢"). talk) 11:46, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Same here ("26 WEEKS FOR 99¢").
- Ref#25 – Can CBS Detroit be linked to either just CBS or WWJ-TV?
- Done talk) 11:46, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Done
- Ref#36 – Can we drop "(Exclusive)" from the title?
- No because that is part of the title. talk) 11:46, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, your choice, though I consider it reluctant. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 12:00, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- No because that is part of the title.
- Ref#1 – Do we need IMDb as publisher, and regardless, IMDb is not a reliable source.
– Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:17, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @talk) 11:46, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Pass for source review. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 12:00, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by RunningTiger123
- Add link to Cinema Audio Society Award for Outstanding Achievement in Sound Mixing for a Motion Picture – Live Action for corresponding award in table
- Footnote a should not have a period
- Grammy Award for Best Instrumental Composition is awarded to a specific piece of music – in this case, "L'Ultima Diligenza di Red Rock" (Versione Integrale); the piece should probably be noted in the table
— RunningTiger123 (talk) 05:41, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @talk) 15:05, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – RunningTiger123 (talk) 00:35, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Image review — Pass
- The only images is appropriately licence, and has ALT text. Pass for image review. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 17:48, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support from Aoba47
- I would clarify this part, some time after the American Civil War. According to the film's Wikipedia article, this film is set in a specific year so something more concrete than "some time" would be beneficial as that could mean countless different things for different readers (like a few weeks, months, years, etc.). For instance, you could say that this happens over a decade after the war.
- I have looked through a few similar featured lists, and while they include the Rotten Tomatoes score, they do not have the critical consensus. I do not think critical consensus is particularly beneficial for readers as this list is more focused on the awards and nominations rather than the reviews.
- I would revise this part, At the BAFTA Awards, the film, since the previous sentence starts with a similar sentence construction so it is somewhat repetitive.
I hope my comments are helpful. Have a great rest of your weekend!
]- @talk) 15:30, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks good to me. I support this FLC for promotion. Hopefully, this will be the push it needs to cross the line for promotion. If possible, I would greatly appreciate any feedback on ]
- Closing note: This WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:20, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.