Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of roles and awards of Angeline Quinto/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of roles and awards of Angeline Quinto

List of roles and awards of Angeline Quinto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Featured list candidates/List of roles and awards of Angeline Quinto/archive1

Nominator(s): Pseud 14 (talk) 16:42, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

After recently expanding the main article of Filipina singer Angeline Quinto, here's her work and awards list which I have lumped into one article, tailored to FLs like List of roles and awards of Oscar Isaac and List of roles and awards of Catherine Zeta-Jones. Happy to address your comments and thanks to all who take the time to review the list. Pseud 14 (talk) 16:42, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• "She played her first leading role on feature film" => "She played her first leading role in a feature film"

Done

• "who pretends as her patron's fiancée." => "who pretends to be her patron's fiancée."

Done

• "Quinto then released here fourth studio album" => "Quinto then released her fourth studio album"

Done

• Some of the entries in the awards table where the recipient is her name and shows it in italics. There is no reason for the italics (also these entries should sort under Q

For her name in italics, that would be her self-titled album as the recipient, they have now been sorted under "Q"

If the award was "Best New Artist", surely the winner was the artist, not her album.....? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:50, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisTheDude: You're right -- my bad. Artist of the year or "artist" wins should be credited to the artist. These have been updated. Pseud 14 (talk) 23:26, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Also, you have two rows where the recipient is "Angeline Quinto" and one where it is "Herself" - be consistent

Same as above explanation, the two entries are the self titled album name as the recipient. The one listed as "Herself" would refer to Quinto as the recipient. Revised per above. Pseud 14 (talk) 23:26, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Recipients which are a song shown in quote marks should sort just on the words, as if the quote marks were not there

Clearly my sorting game has been rusty :) Thanks for catching, fixed now.

• That's it :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:25, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review ChrisTheDude. I have addressed each point above. Let me know if I missed anything. Pseud 14 (talk) 20:48, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:02, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dank

• Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly
  AGF
  on sourcing.
• "several awards and nominations": "several" usually means "not many" or "a small number". 29 seems like more than "not many" to me. (Is this a Philippine English thing?)
• Checking the
  FLC criteria
  :
• 1. I've done a little copyediting; feel free to revert or discuss. I checked sorting on all sortable columns and sampled the links in the tables.
• 2. The lead meets
  WP:LEAD
  and defines the inclusion criteria.
• 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
• 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the
  UPSD
  tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review). The Twitter and Youtube links seem to be official, and are archived. All relevant retrieval dates are present.
• 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
• 4. It is navigable.
• 5. It meets style requirements. The one image seems fine.
• 6. There were recently reverted edits, but I see no evidence of instability (yet). She will certainly get more awards, but at the moment, I don't think there's a problem with the stability criterion.
• Close enough for a support (assuming you and Chris can reach an agreement on the one point left, above). Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 22:24, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your thorough review and edits Dank. You are right. I have revised and changed to "many". Much appreciate your support. Pseud 14 (talk) 23:13, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support from PanagiotisZois

@PanagiotisZois: done for these. Pseud 14 (talk) 20:36, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Pseud 14: All right. Thank you for your patience with me and sorry for being too nitpicky. When I decided to review this list, I wanted to do my job properly. After looking at the prose and sources, I can support this list's promotion. Nice to see a list related to a Filipina pop figure having such high standards. --PanagiotisZois (talk) 20:43, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worries at all, you were doing your due diligence and I highly appreciate the thoroughness. Thank you for your support as well, PanagiotisZois. Pseud 14 (talk) 20:46, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. :) On a separate note, I don't usually do this, but I would appreciate it if you would be willing to review GLAAD Media Award for Outstanding Documentary. --PanagiotisZois (talk) 20:53, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PanagiotisZois, I'd be happy to have a look and review in the next day or so. Pseud 14 (talk) 21:34, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support from NØ

• Regarding the role in Maalaala Mo Kaya, linking "indigenous" to
  Bagobo
  woman" instead?
• "She won a Golden Screen TV Award for Breakthrough Performance by an Actress for her role" - maybe "for the role" instead of "for her role"

The list is very engaging due to the interesting details about the roles. Great work here.--NØ 04:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your taking this review MaranoFan. I have actioned the above comments. Pseud 14 (talk) 14:35, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Glad to support this list on prose.--NØ 15:02, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing the review and your support. Pseud 14 (talk) 15:05, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 13:23, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: This
  WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot
  goes through.