Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Miley Cyrus videography/archive1
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was withdrawn by SchroCat 07:49, 7 August 2014 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Miley Cyrus videography
Miley Cyrus videography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): CyrockingSmiler (talk) 18:48, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because... it is detailed and includes extensive information. It is certainly an important and well-developed piece of content for WikiProject Miley Cyrus and also amongst one of the excellent lists on Wikipedia. CyrockingSmiler (talk) 18:48, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose as I see 3 instances of Youtube, 1 at REF#31, 2 at REF#36, 3 at REF#37. YouTube isn't acceptable. I see unreliable sources like PopDust. I don't even think you have done enough work on this article to nominate it. This article is far away from FL.--219.90.98.14 (talk) 13:05, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- PopDust is unreliable, proof: WP:RSN#Is PopDust a reliable source?. YouTube is not acceptable. A statement that can't be sourced otherwise, will have to be removed.--219.90.98.14 (talk) 13:55, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Hey! @Lady Lotus: Pls come here, we need a more educated editor, or this nomination is doomed..--219.90.99.59 (talk) 15:00, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- PopDust is unreliable, proof:
- If you think this nomination is unfit for FL status, please provide the areas where it needs improvement. CyrockingSmiler (talk) 15:23, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note The above comments from the IP are sockpuppets of indefinitely blocked user Shane Cyrus and should not be taken into accounting. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 10:43, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose I'm sorry but the refs still need a lot of work. I don't consider Idolator a reliable source, same for Youtube, you can use it but not for a FL. Popdust isn't reliable either. Please look at Justin Timberlake videography for examples. Add some pictures, add more references on her film and television career, improve references and you might have something. LADY LOTUS • TALK 15:32, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose I concur with Lady Lotus and suggest withdrawal, though Idolator is a valid source. Timberlake's videography is indeed a good basis for structure of lead AND tables. In addition to malformated references (such as italicizing non-print sources like MTV when they shouldn't be italicized), the lead focuses only on her music videos while giving no detail on her film and television roles. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:00, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for your input. Withdrawing the nomination for now. CyrockingSmiler (talk) 07:18, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. @CyrockingSmiler: next time please ask one of the delegates to withdraw the FLC: there are several other steps that need to be taken as part of the process. – SchroCat (talk) 07:52, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.