Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Russ Prize/archive1
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 17:29, 17 January 2011 [1].
Russ Prize
Russ Prize (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): T 09:17, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I think it meets all the criteria, maybe except 5b. T 09:17, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - It fails 2 as far as I'm aware, also I feel it could easily fail 3b as its comprehensiveness is a question I could see the award being part of the Talk) 19:51, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It isn't a "part". The NAE is a organisation, that awards three prizes for engineering, Russ Prize including.
- On the 3b issue I could easily see all 3 of the lists fitting like this Talk) 22:22, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Nice for you, but it is not lucid and each awards haven't any lead and information. The prizes are all different, Russ Prize is for example awarded to Bioengeneering. So a merging is not really clever. I don't think it is a content-forking list, neither it is a non-stand-alone list. If the Academy Awards awarded every decade per category, would you say the same, only because of less awardees? BTW, there are 5 awards, not 3. I was going to promote all 5 awards to a FLC to get my first FT, but if you think so, I have no other choice to withdraw it.-- T 11:14, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I have added the Leads to the Sandbox to remove the fact neither of the 3 had much information, and its only a 4kb difference at 20kb, which if you pay attention to Talk) 12:22, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I have added the Leads to the Sandbox to remove the fact neither of the 3 had much information, and its only a 4kb difference at 20kb, which if you pay attention to
- Nice for you, but it is not lucid and each awards haven't any lead and information. The prizes are all different, Russ Prize is for example awarded to Bioengeneering. So a merging is not really clever. I don't think it is a content-forking list, neither it is a non-stand-alone list. If the Academy Awards awarded every decade per category, would you say the same, only because of less awardees? BTW, there are 5 awards, not 3. I was going to promote all 5 awards to a FLC to get my first FT, but if you think so, I have no other choice to withdraw it.--
- On the 3b issue I could easily see all 3 of the lists fitting like this
- Comment - It should at the very least include the 2011 winner, [2]. ManfromButtonwillow (talk) 20:18, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- updated-- T 20:34, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I've copy-edited a bit. You must give a reference for the claim that it's one of the prizes known as the "Nobel Prizes of Engineering". Referencing needs to be improved: in the lead, you mention the 2011 winner using this reference which doesn't mention him. I would have thought that there is more to be said about the prize than just the few sentences you currently have – what's said about it by sources other than the NAE, for instance? It's a bit thin at present. ]
- Thank you for your CE. I will search for other sources, except NAE, that give more informations about this award. I can include, even if I am not sure if this is allowed because of copyright, some text from the nomination procedure.-- T 14:42, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks like that the interest is as tiny as the list.-- T 10:15, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per
]- Well then I withdraw this list and see what I can do with the NAE article.-- T 12:15, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.