Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Anne Bancroft

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Anne Bancroft

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2021 at 09:46:55 (UTC)

Original – Anne Bancroft as Lyn Lesley in Don't Bother to Knock (1952)
Reason
Good quality, large size, depicts Bancroft well
Articles in which this image appears
Anne Bancroft
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator
20th Century Fox
  • Support as nominatorLemonreader (talk) 09:46, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Copyright status unclear, "source: eBay" isn't good enough. --Janke | Talk 15:52, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • It doesn't matter what the source is (ebay, a magazine, a blog, etc.). Publicity photos circulated without a copyright notice, which were common at the time [1], are in public domain. Everything about this photo says it falls in that category. Two FP examples: [2], [3]. Bammesk (talk) 15:59, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support The original Ebay item is in the file history and clearly doesn't display a copyright notice. Per my understanding, works published without a notice between 1923 and 1977 automatically ended up in the public domain. I almost opposed the image when I noticed the original was a lower resolution image (and that the image looked a little fuzzy), but on closer inspection of the file history, it does look like a genuine higher resolution version was uploaded. —CodeHydro 15:09, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – I am not familiar with all the details, but for promotional prints like this, I think something is needed to establish that it was circulated without a copyright notice and also to establish the date of publication. Placing an inquiry at Commons:Village pump/Copyright can clear the copyright status. Bammesk (talk) 17:16, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – Nice portrait. Yann (talk) 20:30, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 20:42, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]