Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Bratislava Castle

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2011 at 22:43:03 (UTC)

Support as nominator --Tomer T (talk) 22:43, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Its an excellent picture, but it has a very weak caption. If someone will fix the caption so it is more informative, i will give full support. Dusty777 (talk) 20:08, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This is the lead image for the article. I don't think that a stronger caption is needed in this case because the entire article is about this subject. Pine^talk 04:30, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Great image! –
talk) 03:18, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Support strong EV for its article, decent quality. Pine^talk 04:30, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The colouring strikes me as pretty dull as though it was taken in relatively poor light (lighting on the vegetation seems to confirm this), but I'm not entirely clear on the colour of this building. Images seem to range from a pretty murky dirty yellow, to quite dazzling white; apparently the castle has undergone a recent restoration, so what is the correct colour these days? Also not a fan of the sky, as it doesn't give much contrast with the colour of the building in this image. Image size is a bit stingy, given the size of the building. --jjron (talk) 11:25, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per jjron. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 20:27, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I love the composition, but per jjron, distracting lighting. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me) 09:25, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per my reasoning above (as no explanation has been forthcoming). White buildings come up better with good lighting and blue skies. --jjron (talk) 00:19, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per jjron; colours look a little dull.
stoned 16:06, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 00:05, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]