Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Burnley

Burnley

Reason

a large, detailed and very wide pano showing the town of burnley as well as a host of features in the surrounding geography. Suggested to try here from Peer Review

Articles in which this image appears

Burnley

Creator

Childzy ¤ Talk 18:44, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Support as nominator --Childzy ¤ Talk 18:44, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -- high res, good EV, nice detail.
  talk) 14:21, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support That picture looks raght gud n all quality laik... Proof if needed that life ain't no longer grim oop in that ther north... Gazhiley (talk) 14:38, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Nice to see something local :) J Milburn (talk) 15:13, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. I like this pano too. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 02:02, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Yep - --Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:53, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Support--Mbz1 (talk) 23:48, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Something should be urgently done about the blue haze in the background. This is not supposed to illustrate the weather conditions, but the town, so there's no excuse. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 21:17, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• But surely if the blue haze is in the background then it is not a problem? I don't see much of a haze over the town itself. The large hills in the background are quite far away, so I don't see the blue haze as being particularly unnatural or undesireable.
  talk) 19:29, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Oppose -- Big is not necessarily beautiful or valuable. Sorry, but I can't see a specific reason for promoting this picture other than the size and detail. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 02:08, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think the level of detail in this is exactly the reason to nominate it... Each to their own tho... Gazhiley (talk) 00:42, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • It's a great illustration of Burnley? Is that not reason enough to nominate? Yeah, Burnley perhaps isn't the most exciting of places to many eyes, but this seems like a solid panorama to me. Shows the environment, the kind of housing, gives a feel for the modern town. If I was to criticise, I would say it doesn't speak much about the history of the city, but that's not what it set out to do. J Milburn (talk) 18:38, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • To compare, take a look at today's POTD. It's a view of what I take to be a fairly typical settlement for the area, but looking at it tells me so much- I've never been anywhere like that, I'm transported into a different world. Wikipedia is a worldwide project, and, equally, many people will have never been anywhere like Burnley, and what they imagine it to look like may be completely wrong. J Milburn (talk) 01:27, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Support: Great panoramic picture. -- BigDom 09:14, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Burnley Pano.jpg —