Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Eastern Grey Kangaroo grazing

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Eastern Grey Kangaroo - female grazing

Original - The Eastern Grey has a soft coloured grey or brownish-grey coat, with a lighter silver or cream, sometimes nearly white, belly
Reason
all animal shown, side on, good EV. Seeing a nom lower down for the same species reminded me of this image and made me thought it would be worth uploading.
Articles in which this image appears
Eastern Grey Kangaroo
Creator
Benjamint 11:11, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as nominator --Benjamint 11:11, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Let the battle of the roos commence. :-) Ðiliff «» (Talk) 12:37, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I wonder who will "roo"l the "roo"st at the end of the battle?!!......... Gazhiley (talk) 13:36, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Re this nom and the one below, existing Eastern Grey FP . --jjron (talk) 14:14, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Compared to the current FP, this one is much better IMO. Delist the other? --Muhammad(talk) 11:18, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Support Frame isn't as cluttered as the existing FP, only complaint I have is that it's head is down eating and not raised, is there more shots of this with it's head raised (asking since the photographer is also the nominator)? — raeky (talk | edits) 12:03, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Oppose. The very dark background on the top affects the visual balance. Current FP presents much better pose and composition. Elekhh (talk) 00:37, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Elekhh -- mcshadypl TC 01:15, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • A shot with the head up may be possible, I'll give it a seperate nom if I do manage a better shot -- Benjamint 11:38, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support This image illustrates well an Eastern Grey feeding, and appears to be a female. They look like this when they eat on my lawn! I'd suggest making this a delist and replace. Mostlyharmless (talk) 00:24, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 01:36, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think that there is a quorum - an adequate number of voters. However, there was no consensus to promote this image. Snowman (talk) 19:32, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]