Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Wine grape diagram en.svg
- Reason
- Well done SVG illustration with high EV to the three articles where it appears.
- Articles this image appears in
- Grape, Winemaking, and Acids in wine
- Creator
- LadyofHats
- Support as nominator --[SPEAK] 18:14, 7 November 2009 (UTC)]
- Support Very nice. Unless some expert claims there is some mistake with it I do support. franklin.vp 19:28, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- Comment- I'm confused. Why are the two labeled grapes different and why are some of the text red? The labels "Inner" and "Outer" are ambiguous (inner what?). And the background grape is transparent... ]
- I think the red labels are categories and the black labels that follow are items in that category. For example: There is the category Flesh and then, signaled in the diagram, septal flesh, inner flesh and outer flesh. Also the two grapes are pictured differently because they are showing the structural elements and the other the chemical contents appearing in different zones. franklin.vp 22:36, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- maybe some indentation of the black labels will help with the red-black labels issue. franklin.vp 22:38, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- @ZooFari: Franklin.vp is correct about the labeling. As for the transparent grape, can you fix it? If so it would help. You can also make the labeling clearer if you wish, although I thought it was fine. [SPEAK] 00:21, 8 November 2009 (UTC)]
- @ZooFari: Franklin.vp is correct about the labeling. As for the transparent grape, can you fix it? If so it would help. You can also make the labeling clearer if you wish, although I thought it was fine.
- Comment forgot to say that the transparent grape is no longer transparent. I tried moving the labels but, I didn't like the results. I preffer the way it is than what I did. franklin.vp 19:59, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support. I like the colours, the composition, the information seems quite clear, it's not cluttered or disorganised and it's a SVG. --Silversmith Hewwo 22:53, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support. I presume on the basis of its stability in the articles that it is accurate, and thus that it illustrates the subject well. (If I get time I'll ask a winemaker I know who knows a lot about grape biology to review it for accuracy). Clear and useful. Mostlyharmless (talk) 23:06, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- Comment: Can the space on the left be expanded several pixels so "locule" isn't so close to the edge? On all the other borders, there is more space. Nominate! 23:27, 9 November 2009 (UTC)]
- Done. Was it enough? franklin.vp 23:43, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- I moved your comment; presumably it's directed at me. It's good now. Nominate! 00:01, 11 November 2009 (UTC)]
- Support Seems well sourced enough. ]
- Conditional oppose. Sourcing concerns. It's a bit worrisome when the first source link goes to Blogspot. Use only reliable sources, please. Durova362 18:02, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hey Durova, I think that was a source because it had an image of an actual cut open grape in it. All of the actual nameing data seems to be in later sources (#3 particularly). I think that seeing an actual grape is a prerequisite to drawing one. [SPEAK] 18:34, 10 November 2009 (UTC)]
- Surely Blogspot is not the only available source for an image of a sliced grape? Durova362 18:45, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- Surely the other six sources are more than enough to demonstrate that the information is legitimate. Besides, I=if Blogspot is unreliable, what does that say about your blog there? [SPEAK] 20:19, 10 November 2009 (UTC)]
- I would never use Durova's blog as a cited source, not even for an article on image restoration! If it's good enough to use, it should be published. There are rare exceptions, of course. Mostlyharmless (talk) 00:06, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- I am saying that if I need an image of a cut open grape, I would use the clearest one I could find, regardless of where it is, it's a g-d damned picture of a grape! I don't see the problem, considering that the other sources are good. [SPEAK] 19:11, 12 November 2009 (UTC)]
- I am saying that if I need an image of a cut open grape, I would use the clearest one I could find, regardless of where it is, it's a g-d damned picture of a grape! I don't see the problem, considering that the other sources are good.
- I would never use Durova's blog as a cited source, not even for an article on image restoration! If it's good enough to use, it should be published. There are rare exceptions, of course. Mostlyharmless (talk) 00:06, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- Surely the other six sources are more than enough to demonstrate that the information is legitimate. Besides, I=if Blogspot is unreliable, what does that say about your blog there?
- Surely Blogspot is not the only available source for an image of a sliced grape? Durova362 18:45, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support - Great illustration. We need more featured diagrams. Kaldari (talk) 17:44, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Promoted File:Wine grape diagram en.svg --Muhammad(talk) 04:13, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
