Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Graham cracker

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 May 2020 at 05:23:45 (UTC)

Reason: This is Evan-Amos' public domain image of a notable food: the graham cracker, in fact a stack of them! It's in high-res, tastes good, and looks very delicate. The image here is the lead image of the article Graham cracker. It does a great job at illustrating the subject matter. «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 05:23, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Articles in which this image appears: Graham cracker
Cracker (food)
List of snack foods
Timeline of United States inventions (before 1890)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Food and drink
Creator: Evan-Amos

Support as nominator – «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 05:23, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Looks good n' tasty. -- Veggies (talk)
Comment – Decidedly underwhelming. – Sca (talk) 13:01, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks about as good as the buckwheat picture. -- Veggies (talk) 22:07, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nice comparison «I'm Aya Syameimaru!I文々。新聞Iuserbako» 22:09, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support Very uninteresting in the grand scheme of things, but I can't think of any better pictures of graham crackers. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 22:03, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Sure. We're here to highlight images that add significantly to articles, not to choose the most exciting topics. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 04:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. That's what they look like. One might even argue that a bland photo is appropriate for a deliberately-bland food. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose modern version is nothing special with a second image that isn't in the article Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:43, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Charles, why do you say "that isn't in the article" !? Just look at the infobox Here. Bammesk (talk) 01:38, 1 May 2020 (UTC) . . . Never mind, I think you mean the buckwheat image [1] introduced by User:Veggies. Which isn't nominated. Bammesk (talk) 02:53, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My screen shows a second image captioned This is a Featured Picture of food 10:47, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Oppose I think the buckwheat featured picture that Veggies added as a comparator actually illustrates where this falls short, and how a picture of a simple item can be FP-worthy. The buckwheat FP is clean but natural-looking, with natural-looking shadows especially; and illustrates multiple aspects of a subject (buckwheat, buckwheat flakes, buckwheat crackers) in a pleasing arrangement. By comparison the new image has harsh edges, missing shadows, and only illustrates one aspect of the subject. This is a fine photo, but I think it's very hard to make such a basic food photo FP-worthy, and I think the buckwheat photo shows how it's possible to improve on this. TSP (talk) 15:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:37, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]