Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Kiwi (Actinidia chinensis) 1 Luc Viatour.jpg

Support as nominator Luc Viatour (talk) 08:43, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Conditional support As long as the old featured isn't featured anymore. Why have two featured pics, showing the same thing. Besides, this one does look better. diego_pmc (talk) 09:08, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- As the existing FP no longer appears in any articles, it should probably be delisted anyway. Unless people think this is an inferior replacement, of course. --mikaul^talk 13:39, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Weird color balance (too yellow) - the kiwis I see are also much darker. --Janke | Talk 09:54, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could it just be that these kiwis are less ripe? I rarely eat them so I have a poor frame of reference. -- atropos235 ✄ (blah blah, my past) 01:09, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Oppose per Janke. —αἰτίας •discussion• 16:04, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not really interesting. ^8thstar
Oppose weird positioning99boy (talk) 00:50, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- ~~(Please log in to vote.--jjron (talk) 06:29, 25 March 2008 (UTC))~~[reply]
Support per nom. Cacophony (talk) 06:41, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Over saturation, wrong white balance, and only mediocre composition. --antilived^{T | C | G} 04:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 08:40, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]