User talk:Antilived

Music IdentificationThe link you provided on the help/entertainment desk returns: Forbidden = You don't have permission to access /Unknown_Artist_-_Track_1.ogg on this server. Do you have a better/functioning link? Thanks.

SkierRMH 10:11, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Oops sorry forgot to change the permission. Should be fine now. Thanks for helping. --antilived^{T | C | G} 10:16, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Telomere quadruplex

Concerning Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Translational Motion

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Tomáš Dvořák International Frederick Chopin Piano Competition White meat Galeon Canon TLb Wastewater treatment plant Nikon F5 Hairpin Shane Connor Fravia Canon FTb Clyde, New Zealand Terrestrial stationary waves Canon TX Kodak DCS Pro SLR/c RT-2UTTH Topol M K-PAX (film) Ink Eradicator Mind-blindness

Cleanup Hardstyle Minolta Vectis Adarsh Shiksha Niketan School Merge Fixed phone Fifth grade Ring (telephone) Add Sources Olympus OM-2 History of Czechoslovakia Space capsule Wikify Jerky Boys Bokeh Bristol F.2 Fighter Expand Encryption software Comparison of web servers Light field camera

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 17:24, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Auckland Meetup 2 Scheduled - Feb 10 2007You are invited to Auckland Meetup 2 on the afternoon of Saturday February 10th 2007 at Galbraith's Ale House in Mt Eden. Please see Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland 2 for details. You can also bookmark Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland to be informed of future NZ meetups. -gadfium 08:15, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Along the River 7-119-3.jpg

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Along the River 7-119-3.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for nominating it! KFP (talk | contribs) 10:23, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Passing this on since you identified the tiles. ~ trialsanderrors 21:38, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I have one more question: Which program did you use to identify the original tiles on the NPM website? ~ trialsanderrors 04:02, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

boilerplate fair use template

, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to

fair use rationale

.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:52, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Evermore_-_Light_Surrounding_You.ogg

Image:Evermore_-_Running.ogg

Re: Not so IE7 specific anymore?

The links were not showing the font color.  Tcrow777  talk  17:56, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Additional information on the firmware for the PMP deviceHi, thanks for he link to the pmp101 firmware. I tried it, but it did not work... After updating the device, the PC recognizes de device as a usb drive and I can access the mp3 folder and the DCIM folder, but the screen is still black.

Out of the different firmwares that I have tried, one from Neonumeric was the only one one that was able to turn on the screen, but the icons were bigger than normal and you could not really navigate throught the menus... Anyway, do you happen to know any other link to a firmware based on the spca536 chip (no FM, no Camera, 128MB)? Thank you very much for your help.--Fistanes 21:03, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have one that's got 512 memory without FM or camera. I think pretty much all the PMP series on here (select MP4 on the left, only works in IE) uses spca536, at least until mine, PMP103. What is your MP4's original brand? That may help narrow down compatible firmwares. --antilived^{T | C | G} 05:00, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's a Best Buy Easy Player PMP Flash. I've contacted the company, but they seem reluctant to send me the original firmware. They want me to send the device and they can't even tell me how much it would cost to repair it (since it was a present I do not have the receipt. In any case I believe the warranty already expired) I tried the PMP101, the PMP103 and the PMP103C firmwares and none of them seem to work...--Fistanes 06:06, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi- Re: DNA vs. RNA ImageHi- I wanted to contact you about the DNA vs. RNA image, as I would like to use it in a publication (a reference book), and would like to ask you if/how I can use it abiding by the GNU FDL, and what are any big restrictions that might exist.

Also, is there a way to contact via e-mail directly? If there is a way, let me know what I should/can do to get in touch with you. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Acnaj (talk • contribs) 15:33, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, please see

WP:REUSE for reusing Wikipedia's content. I'm not entirely sure myself how can you abide the GFDL in this case, specifically whether you need to release your publication in GFDL as well. Unfortunately I've lost the original source SVG file of that picture, but I will re-trace it and upload it shortly. --antilived^{T | C | G} 05:43, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mount Roskill Grammar School ^talk

07:06, 11 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

re nav list

GAARGH I can't get it to work. you're welcome to give it a shot. Wikipedia:Reference_desk/header/nav Wikipedia:Reference desk/header/nav/aux. The <li>s shoot off the side of the page no matter how you try to restrict their size. If you want to try it yourself, you'll want to go off the late revisions (a few revisions back, sorry I got a little messed up reverting my changes) of those pages so you have a starting point. --ffroth 01:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I have no idea what you did different than me, the colors don't shoot off the right side! yeah I'm aware of floats not working- not only does it align disgustingly, but it looks terrible in IE. Switching to tables happened in the first week of the header because of complaints IIRC. You're really right about it being preferable to switch to lists/CSS in the nav, but I'm still not convinced it's possible. Can you reproduce the effect of the highlighted tab expanding a bit into the space of other tabs? This is extraordinarily difficult to perfect with tables (right now it's a little broken because of a hack to get it to work when I was writing the header/nav/aux code- the highlighted desk name shouldn't shift downward slightly when bolded) and it _should_ be easier with list items but I can see serious complications at the top and bottom of the list. The way you'd pull this off is (off the top of my head) adding pixels of vertical padding and of negative vertical margins to the highlight tab, so it expands without having to mess with the other tabs. Otherwise it's a nightmare to pull off in wikicode. Oh, and nowiki tags were around the colors because the configuration file always evaluates to a single string- in the case of colors this is a # followed by the 3 rgb octets. In this case obviously it looks like a single item ordered list, so when you transclude it, it tries to transclude the code for a list. Don't believe me? Here's a simplified test- the text should be red, check out the source. I know a lot of the other code in the header is sloppy, I just finished what could almost be considered the 3rd-generation rewrite since it's a drastically different model... it's not pretty because I had to write the entire thing live. Before the rewrite, the header actually had to be called from one of the desks and it was impossible to have a working model in user space, so half of the code was frantically written in short spurts of hacks to fix a just-horribly-broken live header :) --ffroth 06:35, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Well in the main header if those nowikis arent in the configuration file, about 100 list items pop up randomly around the header, so something's going on —Preceding unsigned comment added by Froth (talk • contribs) 13:48, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You For Answering my Question

SHS virus

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Steam Turbine

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Dampfturbine Laeufer01.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 04:56, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

userpage

Mu. It's both intentionally unintentional, and unintentionally intentional. --antilived^{T | C | G} 05:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DIY electric quadricycle

Query

hi gnail i found dis guy who has been going around being an idiot, like editing pages and stuff (just check the Battery Charger article) his IP address thingy on Wikipedia is 170.35.224.63 because i have no idea how to handle these kinds of things and its just annoying trying to read an article and some person has written "poo poo poo charger".... -Fagamalo 4:01, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Tuvalu

Oh sorry, I clicked the wrong user! SpinningSpark 12:27, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AUK

This is an invitation to WikiProject Auckland, a WikiProject which aims to develop and expand Wikipedia's articles on Auckland. Please feel free to join us.

Taifarious1 09:12, 10 March 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks! (Wikipedia:Reference Desk/Computing)

FS Passengers

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

db-author}} to the top of FS Passengers. Icemotoboy (talk) 06:14, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

AfDThanks for uploading

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. Note that the image description page must include the exact name or a link to each article the image is used in and a separate rationale for each one. (If a link is used, automated processes may improperly add the related tag to the image. Please change the fair use template to refer to the exact name, if you see this warning.)

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our

Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 11:44, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Goldenhorse_-_Northern_Lights.ogg

Image:Goldenhorse_-_Run_Run_Run.ogg

Image:Goldenhorse_-_Out_of_the_Moon.ogg

POTD notification

Hi Antilived,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture

chat} 21:54, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Metrication controversyHi Antilived,

You were right to remove my POV about the unit proliferation. It would be nice though if we could find some statistics of what percentage of the US population knows the conversion factors between all common length, weight, area and volume units correctly by heart. Remkos (talk) 17:23, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The GIMP image layer stacking, how?

Hi. I tried anti-aliasing the image but the paths tool wasn't producing the intended result: either it removed the entire image, or it didn't allow erasing of the unwanted parts, or the anti-alias was temporary, or sometimes the paths tool dissapeared when I clicked on another tool, or the shift+v didn't do anything. We are trying to produce a free globe stand similar to this one, but that's copyrighted. Are there areas that still need to be anti-aliased/improved? Thanks. ~

U) 00:23, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Yea you can't select other tools while doing the path, but why would you need to anyway? If you're having trouble with it I suggest you to do it through layer masks: follow the tutorial up to the "Ctrl+I" part (but don't press Ctrl+I), right click on the active layer, press add layer mask, and in the new dialog select "selection". Of course, you need to do that from scratch, on the source images. You can't anti-alias something that's already aliased. --antilived^{T | C | G} 01:05, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please see

U) 18:46, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Just a tip

Yea I had it like that originally and then changed it to "does", based on how "il vaut" is used in French... I don't really use "worth" much so I'm not quite sure which one is correct. Thanks for the pointer. --antilived^{T | C | G} 22:29, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gold globe standWe're trying to make this (the stand, not the globe inside it - that part will probably be replaced):

It's not quite done yet, but we're closer now than ever!

The final image will be used for an award in an upcoming competition using advanced wikitools and called "Around the World".

See the main discussion on the graphics under development for the awards at User:Penubag/graphics.

The Transhumanist 23:44, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

Mobile phones

Reports of organ harvesting from Falun Gong in China}}}. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked

from editing Wikipedia.

The stuff you are trying to add is in complete violation of: WP:RS.

There is absolutely no way such stuff can be kept in the article - it obviously being mere CCP propaganda - stuff that has no acceptance in the academic community - sourced directly from a CCP propaganda website.

Such propaganda has been strongly criticize by all independent, academic sources on the subject and also by HR organizations - including Amnesty and HRW. K-M reports mention such propaganda pushing by the CCP. The Western standard has reported on it.

The RSF has Published a detailed report on CCP propaganda and the extent to which it manufactures things to push its propaganda.[4]

Please note that judged by wikipedia standards, your edits count as blatant vandalism - in complete violation of WP:RS, WP:N and WP:V . I see another editor had reverted the propaganda you wrote into the article, but you insisted on pushing such stuff in. Please refrain from adding such propaganda into the article. Dilip rajeev (talk) 04:51, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have you even seen the talk page? Asdfg had agreed that the source has its merits and that although it should be reworked into to the context it should not be blindly removed. Your ignorance simply amazes me, Dilip. --

WP:RS

?

Phoenix TV is way more mainstream, at least in the Chinese community, than any of the FLG-sponsored media outlet. Can you please point out how it violates RS? And next time, decide on what tag you are going to use, and STOP spamming both the talk page and user talk pages with the same message, as that will only divide up the discussion into hard-to-follow conversations. And please, do everything in 1 edit. Why did you take 6 edits to add that simple comment? I had 2 edit conflicts just to add this message. --antilived^{T | C | G} 05:10, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

It is not an academic study. A lot of propaganda from CCP has appeared on Hong Kong based news channels. We cannot use any of those in the article - because it not only has no standing within the academic or the human rights community - but is also severely criticized by them. Hong Kong news channels have carried news saying Dalai Lama is a CIA sponsored anti-china spy - could we add it into the article on Dalai Lama? Obviously not - that a hong kong news channel ran a video made by CCP, absolutely does not lend it legitimacy. The views must have at least some standing and acceptance in the academic community. The video being allowed to interview people whom western media is not allowed access to - in itself - speaks of the vitiated and propagandistic nature of the piece. Who made the video, what are the international experts on the field such as Kilgour and Matas' views on it, has it got any

Notability

, why doesn't it interview any of the internationally renowned experts on it? I dont think its rocket science stuff to figure out the video is a mere propaganda piece - which no notability in the academic or human rights community.

Dilip rajeev (talk) 05:26, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since when is it an academic matter? Since when does it require human rights organisation approval? How do you know western media is not allowed to access to these people? For what it's worth those inspectors from US consulate probably have talked to these people, interviewed them, just not videoed. Also, have you actually seen those examples or just hearsay? Please provide me with a link? What makes Kilgour and Matas "expert" on this field when they have never stepped in China, never seen the facilities, and have no previous reputation in this field? And for FSM's sake, STOP SPAMMING MY TALK PAGE WITH SO MANY SMALL EDITS! --antilived^{T | C | G} 05:32, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kilgour and Matas have been denied entry into China despite repeated requests. US consulate has said that though it was unable to find evidence during the tour in the specific case of sujaitun, "[i]ndependent of these specific allegations[of sujiatun], the United States remains concerned over China’s repression of Falun Gong practitioners and by reports of organ harvesting."

You may also want to read through the article: According to a 2006 Congressional Executive Commission report, Huang Jiefu, China's Vice Minister of Health, had indicated in July of 2005 that as high as 95% of organ transplants in China derive from execution.[15] The report states that circa 65% of "capital offenses" in China are for nonviolent "crime".

You can do a google on Kilgour or Matas. Amnesty Internation, UN special rapporteur on torture, international medical societies, all have raised acute concerns following the Kilgour Matas reports. Yale university thesis based on financial analysis, undercover sky news reports, all have corroborated KM reports. Needless to say that is an example of something that carries 'notability'. International governments have changed their poilcies, australian hospitals stopped training chinese surgeons on transplant surgery. Thats why KM reports are notable and a worthy source for the article. A chinese CCP propaganda piece that aired in hing kong making wild claims and filming scripted interviews is by no means a neutral source, neither does it satisfy WP:V

Dilip rajeev (talk) 06:16, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We are getting off-track here. How is the statistic of 95% of the organ donations came from executed prisoners relevant to here I don't know, perhaps you are trying to imply a majority of them are FLG practitioners? How ARE any of the claims wild anyway? That a 200-bed hospital simply doesn't have the facility to house 6000 people without causing chaos, or that neither of the hospitals mentioned in the report are capable of doing organ transplantation (it's not just cutting it out from someone and slapping it into someone else, you know)? Since the reports various legislations and standards had been put in place by the government, as documented in the programme. Are those less notable than some Australian hospital refuse to train Chinese surgeons, other than it being less sensational? I suggest you to move all discussion on topic to the talk page, and stop all off-topic discussion. --antilived^{T | C | G} 06:23, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've been mentioned on the admin noticeboard

Thanks for the note. Didn't think it warrants anything more than

WP:3O but doesn't hurt to bring this issue to a wider audience. --antilived^{T | C | G} 06:18, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Antilived (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have only done 3 reverts in total. The only controversial revert I did was this, which was caused by me misunderstanding that User:Asdfg12345 didn't even read my addition before removing it ("I hadn't actually seen you add that giant section. I've removed it." - User:Asdfg12345). Subsequently we had reached a semi-consensus and he didn't remove it again until the summarisation. Then User:Dilip rajeev comes in and reverted it without even reading the talk page or such, twice, repeating the same points of it being hosted on a CCP website on the talk page, which was resolved earlier in my discussion with Asdfg12345. I have been actively talking with other editor(s) throughout the whole process. Although the addition was controversial and disputed at first we have worked out a solution, and IMHO it's perfectly reasonable to maintain a status quo while user:Asdfg12345 works on a summarisation.

Decline reason:

You were blocked for edit warring not for 3RR. The article is on Article Probation and disruptive editing can result in a block or even a ban. Three reverts in six hours counts. — Selket ^Talk 23:22, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing admin: Please see Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Falun Gong. Tiptoety ^talk 22:31, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh so the trick is not to sign in Template:Unblock? OK thanks for the fix. --antilived^{T | C | G} 22:38, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tiptoety, why does the reason say I'm blocked for 3RR violation? How come it's different from the blocked note you've left me above? --antilived^{T | C | G} 22:40, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Drivers Question

I7

Late reply to your Help desk question

1 M colors on

FPC

Image copyright problem with Image:QQlogo.PNGThanks for uploading

Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation

linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 02:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Receiving VOIP/SIP calls without computer on

Good question

your link

nevermind, found it, fixed. thanks Seb az86556 (talk) 12:32, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yea... Can't spell my own name properly lol. --antilived^{T | C | G} 12:55, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dilip rajeev enforcement case

Organ harvesting

Laptop WiFi

That's quite a story! Glad to have helped you. :) --antilived^{T | C | G} 00:54, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Arbitration Enforcement case: Dilip rajeev

Mount Roskill Grammar School

I'm an ex-student if that changes anything. --antilived^{T | C | G} 12:33, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why brackets

I think the current layout is fine as it is only a synopsis, but then I could hardly say anything since I haven't read the book myself :). Good job on the article btw. --antilived^{T | C | G} 20:31, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MB vs MiB

Orphaned non-free image File:QQlogo.PNG

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:48, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not

autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages

.

For the guideline on reviewing, see

here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here

.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Tiptoety ^talk 06:40, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Shen Yun Performing Arts

Re:Logo

Well a design is only as good as the specifications, and in this case there's hardly any :). I have to say I don't know you at all and I don't know what you want, what you like nor what you don't like. So more information, perhaps some things on your mind, designs that you like, etc. would be good. --

 Socks 01  07:12, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Font?What font did you use for this?

 Socks 01  03:31, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Diavolo. --antilived^{T | C | G} 08:58, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

I'm not sure if that's feasible without using images. Don't know what the current signature policy is but images weren't allowed to be used in signatures the last time I looked at it (although I have seen a few image-based signatures). Without the use of images maybe something like

Socks ⁰¹

, depending which colour scheme you want. The rounded border won't work on older IE browsers but most other modern browsers should support it. I tried to skew the signature to make it look like the logo but it doesn't seem to work on inline elements. Here's the code with block elements if you want to try it, but you'd have to change the width if you change the content of your signature.

Socks ⁰¹

As you can see it won't display inline with text so I'm not sure how that's gonna work as a signature. --antilived^{T | C | G} 06:14, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You might need to take a look at this

Notice about discretionary sanctions

Wikipedia:FPC/Rainforest walk delist listed at Redirects for discussion

Non-free rationale for File:TencetTM.PNG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale

.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:18, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: You LostJust FYI, you lost at the Wikipedia:Five-million pool
Have a great day! §haun 9∞76 ^༆ 00:55, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Dunedin Railway Station Full Exterior.jpg

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom Elections 2016

: Voting now open!

Hello, Antilived. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Evermore - It´s Too Late.ogg

Thank you for uploading

image copyright tag

; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also affected:

• File:Evermore - Running.ogg
• File:Evermore - Light Surrounding You.ogg
• File:Magnet - Be With You.ogg
• File:Goldenhorse - Maybe Tomorrow.ogg
• File:Goldenhorse - Northern Lights.ogg
• File:Goldenhorse - Out of the Moon.ogg
• File:Goldenhorse - Run Run Run.ogg
• File:Bic Runga - Beautiful Collision - Get Some Sleep.ogg
• File:Bic Runga - Beautiful Collision - Listening for the Weather.ogg
• File:Bic Runga - Beautiful Collision - Something Good.ogg

ℯxplicit 05:34, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rdconfigarray and Wikipedia:Reference desk/header/deskopts are nominated for deletion

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Antilived&oldid=1184900263"