Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Rhea

Rhea

Reason

Encyclopedic,illustrates subject well,hi-res.Visually striking and good quality.

Articles this image appears in

Rhea (moon)

Creator

NASA,uploaded by WolfmanSF

• Support as nominator --Fireaxe888 (talk) 17:25, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment How do I add the fpc tag to the image page? When I try in Wikipedia Commons it says I should put it on the English Wikipedia,but putting it on the enwiki page doesn't work because the image is transcluded.--Fireaxe888 (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just create the page on enwiki, it will show up next to what is transcluded from Commons. Edit this image page to see the difference. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 17:56, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose this version, Support full res version - brilliant quality, but why was a smaller version uploaded? —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 17:56, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I uploaded a full-res version on commons,but it isn't showing up. --Fireaxe888 (talk) 18:13, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind,fixed --Fireaxe888 (talk) 18:14, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose blown highlights --Uncle Bungle (talk) 10:53, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment The crop is too tight but it could be easily fixed if the nominator makes the file have more "black background".--Caspian blue 22:00, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  Support the new version.--Caspian blue 03:26, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Though I would prefer a wider crop per Caspian Blue.--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 23:58, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  Edit one then.--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 23:25, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Sorry,I'm not too good at image editing.Could anyone here help? --Fireaxe888 (talk) 16:28, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment As requested by Fireaxe888, here's the picture with a larger black border. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs} 16:45, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Anti-Crop The original was too tight. The blown highlights are only a couple of dots here and there and are insignificant.
  talk) 04:31, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Scores in the southern hemisphere, as well as the northern edge of many impact craters. *shrugs* --Uncle Bungle (talk) 11:13, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Support new version with more black space. Highlights a pity, but this isn't easy to re-shoot... --Janke | Talk 07:53, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I had originally uploaded a contrast-enhanced version of the NASA image that was also reduced in size. In switching to the full-size version, the contrast enhancement was lost. I have now restored that in the upper image, while the lower image is the original version with margin adjustment only. The original NASA image does look a bit washed out, due probably mostly to the surface characteristics of this ice world. WolfmanSF (talk)

Support I support the cropped version. Very nice. Elucidate ^{(parlez à moi)} Ici pour humor 14:01, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment At this point, the crop is similar on both versions; please specify whether you support the NASA original or the contrast-enhanced version. WolfmanSF (talk) 15:24, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Definitely NASA version - the contrast-enhanced version blows out more highlights. --Janke | Talk 16:53, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:PIA07763 Rhea full globe5.jpg MER-C 01:50, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]