Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Sue Gardner

Sue Gardner

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2018 at 23:29:07 (UTC)

Reason

I think the only objection I could see to this excellent photograph is whether it's too Wikipedia-focused. This is easily dismissed: A. She's had othe major positions outwith Wikipedia. B. She was ranked the 70th most powerful woman in the world by Forbes. C. We have a fucking featured picture of Jimbo, so, that's an objection now?

Articles in which this image appears

Sue Gardner, Criticism of Wikipedia, Gender bias on Wikipedia

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Business

Creator

Victoria Will

• Support as nominator –
  FPs 23:29, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Oppose - I think the acute angle to her face is unencyclopedic. Something like the image in this article is much better. JJ Harrison (talk) 05:30, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • @
    FPs 10:39, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    • Support the alt. JJ Harrison (talk) 23:53, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Both poses (or are they candid 'action' shots?) by a commercial photographer seem rather odd. Also,
  WP:NAVEL. – Sca (talk) 14:58, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • I think that if we have a picture of Jimbo in FP (we do), it would be odd deny Gardner on
    FPs 16:28, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply
    ]
• Support Alt 1 – for lead image in her article. Bammesk (talk) 16:36, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose both I don't think that either image is FP-worthy. The original is a striking portrait (and the best choice for the infobox, IMO), but doesn't have FP-level EV as it doesn't clearly show her face and is too posed. Alt 1 is clearer, but also isn't a great portrait due to the facial expression. Nick-D (talk) 04:08, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]